Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We aren't arguing over content, quite the opposite I think we agree on a lot of things.
The only thing I've argued with you about is when you fabricated statements, attributed them to me and then got ground up into weasel-chow.
If you have to post lies so you have something you can then disagree with, then you have a bright career ahead of you in the political forum.
Oh noooo, no political forum for me. I pop my head in there very rarely if it's something I'm really passionate about, but for the most part it seems just a place to insult one another.
Which is fine, and legal and has nothing to do with this.
Is illegal, and although not likely, grounds for impeachment.
Also illustrates the progressive disregard for US sovereignty,which is very relevant as to where the UN small arms treaty is concerned.
Last edited by Frank DeForrest; 06-13-2011 at 01:35 PM..
if Bammer really does agree with this, then this alone should disqualify him from being President.
He should step down now if he believes in this treaty.
Heh, let's not forget that Obama is a master politician that is real big on lip-service in order to get votes and campaign contributions.
Remember, Obama was going to close Guantanamo and get us out of Iraq and not be in the pocket of the banks and oil companies? Honestly, any of you that fall for any type of gun posturing I have a bridge to sell you.
It would help if you actually go to the UN site and read the documents rather than rely on what someone says the documents say. I own a lot of guns and don't feel at all worried about what I read there.
The purpose of the documents is to restrict the TRANS BORDER movement of small arms (most of which are/were produced in the USSR and China - the AK47)
No president can enter into a treaty without the advise and consent of the Senate. No president can enter into a treaty that overrides US laws.
Somebody is yanking your chain folks.
So many things that most of us didn't think could be done by our President have been done since January 2009. I think you need to take a look at what all has been done and then made ok by Executive Order. Maybe our Constitution is really in the way of progressives and will soon be done away with.
I will admit that the Kyoto Agreements were never approved by either the President or the Senate but our VP at the time took part in drawing it up and he has continued to side with everybody who has ever believed in global warming.
I take it you know that those global warming treaties sponsored by the UN are about to die.
It will never be valid in the US, won't pass the "snif" test and even IF congress is dumb enough to ratify it and foolish President sign it....it will be tossed out by the SCOTUS.
Will there always be a panel of 9 people who can protect us with that scrap of paper? I think that we have neared the end of our nice place because we are slowly giving in to progressives and that Constitution is standing in their way. Of course, we don't know what day Obama and Biden will throw out the document with an Executive Order since they have been so successful with like things up to now.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
