Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-09-2011, 11:59 PM
 
Location: Northern CA
12,770 posts, read 11,563,570 times
Reputation: 4262

Advertisements

this is how crazy it's gotten: FDA finally admits chicken meat contains arsenic.

Arsenic? Eat more!
But even as its arsenic-containing product is pulled off the shelves, the FDA continues its campaign of denial, claiming arsenic in chickens is at such a low level that it’s still safe to eat. This is even as the FDA says arsenic is a carcinogen, meaning it increases the risk of cancer.
The National Chicken Council agrees with the FDA. In a statement issued in response to the news that Roxarsone would be pulled from feed store shelves, it stated, “Chicken is safe to eat” even while admitting arsenic was used in many flocks grown and sold as chicken meat in the United States.
What’s astonishing about all this is that the FDA tells consumers it’s safe to eat cancer-causing arsenic but it’s dangerous to drink elderberry juice! The FDA recently conducted an armed raid in an elderberry juice manufacturer, accusing it of the “crime” of selling “unapproved drugs.” (http://www.naturalnews.com/032631_e… (broken link)) Which drugs would those be? The elderberry juice, explains the FDA. You see, the elderberry juice magically becomes a “drug” if you tell people how it can help support good health.
The FDA has also gone after dozens of other companies for selling natural herbal products or nutritional products that enhance and support health. Plus, it’s waging a war on raw milk which it says is dangerous. So now in America, we have a food and drug regulatory agency that says it’s okay to eat arsenic, but dangerous to drink elderberry juice or raw milk.
Eat more poison, in other words, but don’t consume any healing foods. That’s the FDA, killing off Americans one meal at a time while protecting the profits of the very companies that are poisoning us with their deadly ingredients.
Oh, by the way, here’s another sweet little disturbing fact you probably didn’t know about hamburgers and conventional beef: Chicken litter containing arsenic is fed to cows in factory beef operations. So the arsenic that’s pooped out by the chickens gets consumed and concentrated in the tissues of cows, which is then ground into hamburger to be consumed by the clueless masses who don’t even know they’re eating second-hand chicken sh*t.
FDA finally admits chicken meat contains cancer-causing arsenic «
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-10-2011, 12:35 AM
 
3,681 posts, read 6,274,458 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
And when it was almost a done deal a study popped up showing that pasture raised cows (grass only with very little grain) on rotational grazing didn't fart as much as feedlot cows so only Big Ag would have been impacted.

*poof*....cow farts will NOT destroy the planet as previously thought.
That one backfired on Big Ag.

Grass fed beef and methane - Crunchy Chicken
Hope a study pops up in time to save the burping camels in Australia!


Australia May Pay Camel Killers in an Effort to Combat…Climate Change? | The Blaze
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2011, 04:20 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,550 posts, read 17,227,205 times
Reputation: 17590
"No kidding and did he mention which Fortune 100 companies benefited from the business for their companies those regulations would result in?
They probably didn't think about it that deeply but they should. Behind every government "safety" or "energy conservation" regulation is a Fortune 100 company if not multiple companies AND government officials who stand to profit from it. EVERYONE needs to FOLLOW THE MONEY.

These regulations have NOTHING to do with "safety" or "conservation" or what have you and EVERYTHING to do with CONTROL of the populace and PROFITS for the elites."

So true and if you include all the regs in the tax code you will find endless custom made loop holes that apply to individual or very small groups that have curried favor with some legislator who has returned the favor.

Thinking even more 'deeply' one realizes it is not the companies that pass legislation. The lobbyists are impotent, only a legislator can pass a law!

The culprit who deserves full credit are the elected legislators!
Life time appointments by merit of corscrew shaped voting districts keep these guys in for decades. In that time they can accumulate a bunch of hidy holes, power and knowledge of how to work the system they customize to make what seems evil, legal.

With herds of Goldman Sach alum running the treasury you have to conclude the government is of such low character they can easily be manipulated by power and money. WE need to change the criteria we use to select future legislators.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2011, 06:32 AM
 
Location: it depends
6,369 posts, read 6,408,962 times
Reputation: 6388
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
There aren't many farms owned by humans anymore.

It is mostly corporate, now.

Looks like there really WERE wolves out there.

Not all persons are human.
sheesh!

1. Exxon, Walmart, IBM, and every other corporation is ultimately owned by humans, directly or indirectly. I'm human, and I have a direct percentage ownership in those three; I own mutual funds which own them; I have a small pension benefit that may also be backed by ownership in them.

2. When Smith incorporates his farm, did anything really change from Smith running the farm himself to Smith running the farm as president of Smith Farms Inc.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2011, 06:55 AM
 
1,777 posts, read 1,402,934 times
Reputation: 589
Molasses can cause major problems if it spreads out too much:

Boston Molasses Disaster - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I haven't been able to find anything on the regulations you talk about in a quick search, but that certainly doesn't mean they aren't real. For the dust one, perhaps the government doesn't want the farm kicking up so much dust that it becomes a nuisance to nearby neighbors? I'm not necessarily saying that these regulations make sense (especially since I haven't been able to read them), but conspiracy theory type talk of "they want to control your lives and make you worse!" doesn't actually help anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2011, 07:02 AM
 
21,026 posts, read 22,150,071 times
Reputation: 5941
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
In southern illinois.

Every stop, when asked what they worry about in the future, all 3 farmers (a hog farmer, dairy farmer, and grain farmer) and the feed store guy all told me government regulations were their main worry.

For example, the feed store owner said that to store his 1000 gallons of molasses, he had to build a berm around it so it couldn't spread if it spilled. it's sugar. You can eat the stuff. But the EPA says it's dangerous. The dairy farmer actually said the same thing. Initially, because milk has fat, it was classified as an "oil" and the same law applied. It was then lifted this year before it got enforced.

The dairy farmer said they have to spend $500,000 to get compliant. He can't do that, and is only currently 80% compliant. He's hoping to get there eventually.

They all agree that government regulators are just idiotic, and don't use common sense. And there are people that think we need to put them in charge of our health care?
Bet they don't complain about the government "regulations" when those GIANT subsidy checks arrive in the mail....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2011, 07:08 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calvinist View Post
They all agree that government regulators are just idiotic, and don't use common sense. And there are people that think we need to put them in charge of our health care?
So why is it those who complain the most have no problem putting these very same people in charge of our nuclear arsenal and going to war?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2011, 07:13 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,783,759 times
Reputation: 24863
I'll also bet the corn farmers, their equipment suppliers and their bankers don't complain about the idiotic government regulation we contaminate our gasoline with alcohol. I bet they didn't complain when NAFTA eliminated Mexico's tariff on imported corn resulting in the impoverishment of millions of Mexican farmers. I bet the dairy farmers don't complain about the floor on milk prices provided by the government marketing bureaus. I’ll bet they don’t complain about the government policies that turned nearly impoverished farmers into millionaires worried about protecting the fortune from the kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2011, 07:15 AM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24980
It's not just farmers being killed off the by the cancer known as government.
Talk to any small business person or better yet, try and start one up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-10-2011, 08:04 AM
 
6,484 posts, read 6,616,340 times
Reputation: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
So why is it those who complain the most have no problem putting these very same people in charge of our nuclear arsenal and going to war?
I kind of got the feeling that these guys didn't vote for the current administration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:26 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top