Was Weiner wrong to falsely implicate Breibart? (history, USA, corrupt)

[pommysmommy]

Weiner knew his Twitter account had not been hacked but he implicated Breitbart as a likely hacker. Is he a total partisan scumbag for trying to implicate Breitbart. I think he is.

[TheDirector]

Breitbart does have a history of scumbaggary.

Shirley Sherrod comes to mind.

[pommysmommy]

Originally Posted by TheDirector

Breitbart does have a history of scumbaggary.

Shirley Sherrod comes to mind.

But was Weiner right to falsely implicate Breitbart?

[Irishiis49]

Weiner is a classic addict...if their mouth is moving they're lying!!

[TheDirector]

Originally Posted by pommysmommy

But was Weiner right to falsely implicate Breitbart?

If he was trying to weasel out of it...YES attacking the credibility of a known slanderer would be a good strategy.

If he would of done the smart thing and fess up then NO it was wrong.

[evilnewbie]

Of course not... false accusations are completely and entirely inappropriate... there is no excuse for making a false accusation... none...

[BentBow]

It is called framing someone for a crime.

He tried.

Shows the corrupt values of the progressive left.

The end justifies the means.

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by TheDirector

Breitbart does have a history of scumbaggary.

Shirley Sherrod comes to mind.

DEMS to the rescue.....

WHO cares.......weiner screwed the pooch and was caught....

But as long as it was a leftie....WHO cares?

What a leftie does is just fine, until a rightie does it....

[TheDirector]

I don't see why he even lied about it in the first place. Maybe for a day or so is understandable if you get caught off guard but for something so petty he should of just fessed up.

Breitbart finally got one I guess bravo to him.

[Kathleen1971]

I think Breibart is a total scumbag, but Weiner was absolutely wrong to implicate him. No doubt about it here.