Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
First, there is no such thing as "normal" beyond a personal, subjective interpretation of it. Second, why does there need to be any justification for any sexual preference/attraction? Not one human being can control a physical sexual response. We can choose whether or not to act on those attractions, but we do not control the intial response. If there is no tangible harm involved, I'm not sure why it should even matter how anyone acts upon their attractions. Can you give any serious, logical reasons?
There is no such thing as normal? So theres no such thing as abnormal? is that what your saying?
I can give a flying leap what you do just don't tell me it's normal because I know what normal is and it's not having a penis stuck up your anus.
What difference does it make? Are you serious? It makes a world of difference. Redefined marriage will be nothing more than an empty meaningless procedure just to obtain benefits and will open the door to further modification and adjustments in order to accommodate other uniquely self afflicted parties who feel they are also being denied.
You completely ignored my point. Opposite sex individuals can already participate in an empty meaningless procedure just to gain benefits. So since 95% of the population can already do it, why do you care if the other 5% can?
Your not a black swan or a Penguin get some common sense. Your anus is not a mangina although you want it to be.
Aside from your crude remark, you 1) Fail to realize that the prostate is the male-g spot with sexually stimulated nerve endings around it. Why is that there from a "design" standpoint?
And 2) not all gay men have anal sex and most lesbians (those who don't have relations with men too) do not either. Plenty of heterosexuals, however, do have anal sex (more than gays from a strictly numbers standpoint).
So why do you continue to reduce gay people to nothing more than anal sex? Oh that's right, as a bad strawman to villify them with your bigotry.
Can I have the right to think homosexuality is wrong?
Of course, but you cannot say so in public.
Can I have the right to think homosexuality is right?
Of course, and you can yell it from the mountain top and get in the face of those who disagree with you.
See how diversity works?
Excellent point! I also just witnessed someone in the relationship forum stating that "tranny" is a "derogatory term" for transexuals. Honestly, this proves my point in my thread about PC getting out of control! What else are we supposed to call transgendered people?? Seriously.
Excellent point! I also just witnessed someone in the relationship forum stating that "tranny" is a "derogatory term" for transexuals. Honestly, this proves my point in my thread about PC getting out of control! What else are we supposed to call transgendered people?? Seriously.
Um, how about transgendered, or their sub categories (transsexual, intersex, androgyne, etc.) ?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
