Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-21-2011, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,448,604 times
Reputation: 6541

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
You don't hang out much with old people who've smoked, do you. I do and I don't know a single one who doesn't have a smoking related disease---or died from one. Any heart or lung specialist will back up the fact that smoking is extremely harmful to the human body.
I have been smoking a pack and a half per day for the last 45 years. During my last pulmonary exam last year the doctor informed me that I had the lungs of a non-smoker at my age. When I informed the doctor that I had been smoking for 44 years he refused to believe me until I showed him my pack of cigarettes.

As I previously posted, everyone reacts differently to tobacco use.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-21-2011, 09:09 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,866,888 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
You don't hang out much with old people who've smoked, do you. I do and I don't know a single one who doesn't have a smoking related disease---or died from one. Any heart or lung specialist will back up the fact that smoking is extremely harmful to the human body.
So there is no need for the stupid government mandated warnings,as everyone already knows the risks.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 09:10 AM
 
5,999 posts, read 7,097,789 times
Reputation: 3313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Because they are no longer warning people about the risks involved with smoking. Now they are flat-out lying by claiming it is a certainty that smoking causes a fatal lung disease. Naturally, I expect nothing less from the morally bankrupt Democrats.

So smoking does not cause lung cancer? Link?

This has nothing to do with partisan politics, this is strictly a health issue. I am as conservative as they get and I support this. If you smoke, you are a moron, if these pictures remind you of your moronic behavior, oh well; smoke away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 09:10 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,866,888 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophiasmommy View Post
I'm a staunch conservative and have no problem with this. Stupidity isn't illegal and this doesn't make it so.
You obviously do not believe in smaller government or less government intrusion into our lives...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 09:12 AM
 
5,999 posts, read 7,097,789 times
Reputation: 3313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafius View Post
WARNING.

Food may cause fat bastards.



Operative word is may. Most people eat in moderation and good food has a ton of nutritional benefits. Can one smoke in moderation and receive nutritional benefits from cigarettes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 09:12 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,866,888 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophiasmommy View Post
Seriously? Because driving a car, using a knife and swimming in a pool are not inherently dangerous to your health. Smoking has zero benefits. If you choose to smoke in this day and age, you are a moron. Btw, I support your write to be a moron.
Driving a car is not inherently dangerous?
Really?

It may have other benefits but to state it isn't dangerous is a little...naive.

Stop being a nanny stater,let people do what they want and don't demand the nanny state interfere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 09:13 AM
 
855 posts, read 1,172,991 times
Reputation: 541
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
You obviously do not believe in smaller government or less government intrusion into our lives...

ummm how is this intrusion in our lives? Are speed limit signs also an intrusion to deny our right drive fast; or maybe rip current signs on the beach are intrusions to deny our right to swim in rough tide?? you have got to be kidding me....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 09:13 AM
 
Location: The Midst of Insanity
3,219 posts, read 7,080,949 times
Reputation: 3286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krazyone57 View Post
A lot of people react differently to pictures as opposed to words. So again.. How is warning people of health risk a bad thing? How are the warning labels a bad thing?
By that logic, how about pictures of various destroyed organs on processed food packaging, as a warning of the health effects of obesity?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 09:14 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,866,888 times
Reputation: 2519
Quote:
Originally Posted by chariega View Post
ok and since people who drive without seatbelts make it to their destinations w/o flying through a windshield, we didn't need crash test dummies commercials in the 80s?
DO you think you should be forced to wear a seatbelt?

Quote:
Maybe you're terrified of the big, scary pictures... The fact is, smoking related diseases are way scarier than a few pictures printed on a pack of cigarettes.
Why do you care if pics are put on the packs,why is it the states business?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2011, 09:15 AM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,448,604 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophiasmommy View Post
So smoking does not cause lung cancer?
No, it does not cause lung cancer with absolute certainty, it substantially increases the risk of contracting certain cancers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophiasmommy View Post
This has nothing to do with partisan politics, this is strictly a health issue. I am as conservative as they get and I support this. If you smoke, you are a moron, if these pictures remind you of your moronic behavior, oh well; smoke away.
The current warning has nothing to do with health, and everything to do with Democrats once again attempting their social re-engineering. The warning is a flat-out lie to deliberately mislead people in order to achieve a desired behavior. Do not be so naive as to believe that this has anything to do with health.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top