Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So you're cool with the Iraq war costing about $1 trillion with massive civilian causalities and US military causalities and injuries, but have a problem with Obama spending $1 billion and just using airstrikes and no US military causalities?
How so? Many of us are against these wars. These people are barbaric savages, we have no business being in their dirty, dusty countries. If they want democracy, they should do something about it.
...you guys realize that, like...people have memories, and things are documented, right? The general consensus was that the wars were justified, and if any dirty liberal were against them, they were Anti-America and wanted the troops to fail. Not even that, if you happened to bring up the factthat their were no ties between Saddam and Al Qaeda, they'd come in with the same old "AMERICAFREEDOMWHYDOYOUHATEIT!!1!" rhetoric.
There was a world prior to 1/20/09. People don't forget who was doing what from 2001-08...
...you guys realize that, like...people have memories, and things are documented, right? The general consensus was that the wars were justified, and if any dirty liberal were against them, they were Anti-America and wanted the troops to fail. Not even that, if you happened to bring up the factthat their were no ties between Saddam and Al Qaeda, they'd come in with the same old "AMERICAFREEDOMWHYDOYOUHATEIT!!1!" rhetoric.
There was a world prior to 1/20/09. People don't forget who was doing what from 2001-08...
Great post. Their delusion is truly sickening and frightening.
...you guys realize that, like...people have memories, and things are documented, right? The general consensus was that the wars were justified, and if any dirty liberal were against them, they were Anti-America and wanted the troops to fail. Not even that, if you happened to bring up the factthat their were no ties between Saddam and Al Qaeda, they'd come in with the same old "AMERICAFREEDOMWHYDOYOUHATEIT!!1!" rhetoric.
There was a world prior to 1/20/09. People don't forget who was doing what from 2001-08...
I guess you better get on the horn to the acting Sec of State......
"“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capabilities, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members.”
I was wondering what good negotiations would do since Qaddafi has nowhere to go and really has no options but to fight to the end, but then I saw from the page you provided that Codepink is using "signs in the shape of planes saying “Don’t Bomb Libya” and other creative visuals".
That should solve the problem.
Oh I agree with your view point. I was just qualifying the original OP. Code Pink was not being hypocritical in this instance. The Left wing media on the other hand......
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
