Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-24-2011, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,190 posts, read 19,462,661 times
Reputation: 5305

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 90sman View Post
Eisenhower appeared to have the highest approval ratings. At his lowest, his approval rate was still 57%, with the highest disapproval rating at 32%. Even though he was a Republican, he still had high approval ratings from Democrats.

Obama's approval ratings have fallen faster than any other president except for Truman.
Cough Reagan Cough
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-24-2011, 01:19 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,383 posts, read 60,575,206 times
Reputation: 60996
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
So now they are blaming Republicans for sabotaging the economy.

What's next, blaming the Tea Party for the war in Libya?

Funny you should say that:

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...-ghaddafi.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2011, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Couple things to point out.

The daily polling wasn't around then, so you didn't see the daily bounces (casing point going by today, which is closer to Reagan's dates for the 47% approval, Obama is at 45%). Not to mention after hitting the 47% in late June of 83, Regan dropped and was mostly under that 47% mark (with polls ranging from 42-44 in July & August of 83). Went back to 47 after that and dropped back slightly, and then in late October is when he started to pull back up.

So basically Reagan reached his low point in early 1983, got a bit of a boost until late Spring/early Summer. Then the boost in his approval fluctuated a bit, at times even dropping back slightly during the summer and early fall of 83 before starting a true run which lasted through Election Day

Yeah, I can definitely see Reagan picking up support after the first of the year.

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/unit...tes/gdp-growth

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/unit...mployment-rate


Not so much BO...

That borrowed stimulus thing didn't do what it was supposed to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2011, 02:37 PM
C.C
 
2,235 posts, read 2,363,015 times
Reputation: 461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunny-Days90 View Post

Then we can start to clean up the WH and get working on fixing the disaster he, Nancy and Harry has left this country in.
And there's sure to be a barrage of ads showing him yukking it up with the toadlike Reid and pass-the-bill-so-we-can-see-what's-in-it Pelosi. Won't that be a pretty sight?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2011, 02:55 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smash255 View Post
Cough Reagan Cough


The numbers are very similar for Reagan, Clinton and Carter with Reagan starting from a lower point than both Clinton and Carter. What happens at day 884 is both Clinton and Reagan continue to gain on strong economic news thanks to a robust dollar, solid GDP growth, low inflation and falling unemployment. Carter tried the Keynesian weak dollar approach which crashed the economy. Obama is doing the same thing and experiencing similar results.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2011, 03:25 PM
 
Location: SARASOTA, FLORIDA
11,486 posts, read 15,306,908 times
Reputation: 4894
Quote:
Originally Posted by momonkey View Post
So now they are blaming Republicans for sabotaging the economy.

What's next, blaming the Tea Party for the war in Libya?
The economy was already tanking before the reps took over in January.

They still have total control in many ways with the Senate and the doof in the WH who believe he can just make up rules and laws.

The demorats are responsible for 2 recessions on their watch since 2007.

They had TOTAL CONTROL for 2 years and look what they did? Nothing but worked on the failed scamcare, crash for clunkers and the stimuless failure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2011, 05:00 PM
 
764 posts, read 597,246 times
Reputation: 660
Bush had a high approval rating because of 9/11 only. The country had this blind sense of Patriotism after the attacks. If it wasn't for 9/11, he wouldn't have been elected in 2004, since he wouldn't have had "tear" (Terror) to use as a crutch...

Last edited by Lithium; 06-24-2011 at 05:47 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2011, 05:41 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
It is called Lame Duck, and the Progressives with a 2/3 majority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2011, 11:04 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,378,527 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lithium View Post
Bush had a high approval rating because of 9/11 only. The country had this blind sense of Patriotism after the attacks. If it wasn't for 9/11, he wouldn't have been elected in 2004, since he wouldn't have had "tear" (Terror) to use as a crutch...

The upswing was definitely due to 9/11 and the new war on terror (whatever that means), but so was the downturn as Democrats who voted to authorize war with Iraq used the same war to slander Bush in 2004. Had there been no 9/11, Bush II would likely have been a very mediocre president with a largely uneventful presidency whether he edged out Kerry or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-24-2011, 11:05 PM
 
11,531 posts, read 10,290,404 times
Reputation: 3580
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
GWB's approval rating in October 2008 was 25%...

Obama hasn't gone below 41%
LOL. End of troll thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top