Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-25-2011, 07:50 PM
 
Location: SC
9,101 posts, read 16,449,841 times
Reputation: 3620

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mackinac81 View Post
A common thing I hear from conservatives is that taxation is a form of theft, but those same conservatives make exceptions to that (like law enforcement, military etc) But if taxing is forcibly taking money from one group of people and giving it to another then how can you justify taxes at all--even for the military? To me that's inconsistent. Either taxation is theft or it isn't. Taxation is either right or it is wrong. How do you explain this?

mackinac
As far as I'm concerned if it is military spending to protect OUR OWN borders it is not theft. If it is starting or continiuing/expanding unconstitutional wars or Kinetic/humanitarian bombing (Ugh, talk about oxymorons) it is stealing!

It isn't inconsistent. History proves that taxation is regressive and only leads to bigger government less freedom and lower standards of living. We need to return to a smaller government that leaves small and medium sized businesses alone and forces the Fortune 50 companies to compete with them on a level playing field WITHOUT favorable legislation passed by the federal government to ensure the success of the BIGS like we have now.

There is NO REASON for the Federal Government to be so big and have so many departments. The States are better able to take care of everything the Federal government tries to stick its nose in except for the Military.

The Solution is simple...just like Ron Paul has said for years. We have to DRASTICALLY CUT the out of control spending. NO MORE raising the debt ceiling. The more that is raised, the more expensive food and every day items will cost all of us ya know.... Start reading your Austrian Economics at mises.org to begin to understand how things got so messed up.

No exaggeration: Both the Federal Reserve and 98% of Congress are completely clueless and have been spending us into a bottomless pit! It has GOT to STOP!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-25-2011, 08:54 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
4,027 posts, read 7,285,888 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Of course not! Liberalism, when examined on a personal level, is nearly insane. However, extrapolate the same ridiculous sentiments to a national level and you have a "rational" political position- amusing and shocking at the same time.
I know, it's crazy to think of someone other than "Me, me me!" all the time. And the fact that they don't have the "I have mine, f*** you." mentality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2011, 09:26 PM
 
Location: SC
9,101 posts, read 16,449,841 times
Reputation: 3620
Quote:
Originally Posted by NHartphotog View Post
Yes, I'm a Libertarian, and my post is generally the Libertarian view of government. Of course supporters are along a spectrum of how far they would go with Libertarian reforms. Since the unified Republicrat Party has pushed America so far in the opposite direction in recent decades, we would need a totally committed Libertarian President working full time for 2 terms to bring our nation to some sort of reasonable balance between the taxpayer and the Special Interests and ultra-rich that now have total power.

Ron Paul is currently the only politician in Washington who would make ANY moves to bring government back under some sort of control, and I hope (though I don't expect) that if he was elected he would push Libertarian reform at the same rapid pace as Obama has pushed our nation into Socialism and bankruptcy. More likely the powers-that-be would threaten him and his family, and have him killed if necessary, if he made more than token attempts at reform.

However, we have to start somewhere, or just accept the coming collapse of the house-of-cards and start over again after a long period of revolution, mass starvation, and violence in the streets.
Gary Johnson would also. He even has a track record of so in so in Arizona as governor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-25-2011, 10:16 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,213,219 times
Reputation: 6553
It might stop being theft if.
They write a budget that cuts out waste, foreign aid and all pork.
If the fed learned to live within its means.
if the elected reps had to share the costs of their benefits like the rest of us.
If it were a flat tax or consumer based tax.
Stopped sending our military to every hot spot and acting like the worlds police force.
enact trade policies that mirror our trading partners.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2011, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Upstate SC
958 posts, read 2,620,500 times
Reputation: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by emilybh View Post
Gary Johnson would also. He even has a track record of so in so in Arizona as governor.
Gary Johnson was never governor of Arizona.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2011, 12:23 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,471,329 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Conservatives: When is taxation NOT theft?

when its done at the LOCAL level, by LOCAL assemblies REPRESENTING LOCAL issues

I dont mind paying federal taxes..but taxes should be EVEN and EQUAL in rate accross the board.....ie a FLAT RATE (ie 10%) you make 10,000---you pay 1,000.....you make 1,000,000 you pay 100,000..or....a federal comsuption tax..everyoner pays.........................but liberal wont have that because they want UNEQUAL taxation(DISCRIMINATORY) to they can have their boogyman of the "rich"



why do liberals always make themselfs look dumb by bringing up teachers, police and fire, when taking about federaltaxes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2011, 12:33 PM
 
Location: PA
5,562 posts, read 5,680,664 times
Reputation: 1962
Taxes are a result of all governments.
Depending on what type of government you have one that believes in a large role in our economic and personal lives you will have higher and forceable taxes.
A government less interested in controlling your lives and for individual economic liberty will have less taxes and likely no INCOME TAX.
Groups of people see all forms of a oppressive government who use force to obtain tax as theft.
So the question not what the tax should be its what is the proper role of government.

If you like warfare, welfare and the nanny state taxes will always be the destruction of liberty and the health of the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2011, 12:40 PM
 
16,545 posts, read 13,447,180 times
Reputation: 4243
It's not theft when you you use the system you are being taxed for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2011, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,806,382 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
It is called user fees. Meaning when you use the service you pay. That is a tax.
"User fees" sounds like the typical Ticketmaster gimmickery. So, how do you apply this idea of "user fees" to sales tax on, say, gasoline, electronics or food?

Quote:
Originally Posted by NHartphotog View Post
we should only have to pay for that which is NECESSARY to defend ourselves against foreign aggression. With nuclear weapons, this should cost everyone about $10 a year, maybe $20.
Only defense?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2011, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,894,702 times
Reputation: 4512
Quote:
Originally Posted by mackinac81 View Post
A common thing I hear from conservatives is that taxation is a form of theft, but those same conservatives make exceptions to that (like law enforcement, military etc) But if taxing is forcibly taking money from one group of people and giving it to another then how can you justify taxes at all--even for the military? To me that's inconsistent. Either taxation is theft or it isn't. Taxation is either right or it is wrong. How do you explain this?

mackinac
Taxation isn't theft when you tax consumption, for example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top