Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-13-2012, 01:22 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,451,622 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
They fix it by getting rid of it. There is no shame in living in a van.

Section 8 people are trash and have no pride in upkeep of their surroundings.

There may be no shame in living in a van but there might be fines and penalties.

What's wroong with my plan? Give landlords more choice. That would eliminate the trash problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-13-2012, 01:36 PM
 
1,182 posts, read 1,139,634 times
Reputation: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clevelander17 View Post
What are your thoughts on this program? Good or bad?

I've read a few interesting articles about Section 8 recently and it appears that this program, with apparently noble goals, is not working and in fact causing big problems in otherwise decent neighborhoods. What can be done to fix this program? And if the answer is "nothing," how can we get politicians to change this policy?
This is going to sound out of the box but I think the best thing we can do is to allow AFFIRMATIVE housing discrimination. Much like Affirmative Action in colleges and employment. I would like to see the law allow carefully monitored housing integration programs that would be done by both race and class. Let's say a development has 100 housing units in it and it submits a proposal to set aside 15% of the units for Hispanics, 15% for blacks, 5% for Asians and the remaining 65% for whites. As for class, it could submit a plan to set aside 6% of the units for Section 8 use but with no clustering of such units allowed in the development. Such a plan could be monitored by the Dept of Housing. The problems with Sec 8 are that they tend to cluster in certain developments or even certain parts of developments. The idea of Sec 8 is to get the poor people on it to assimilate into the larger socieity and adopt the values of the middle class. The only way to do that is for them to live surrounded by middle class people. When they do, they generally assimilate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 01:46 PM
 
3,281 posts, read 6,276,419 times
Reputation: 2416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruin Rick View Post
The only way to do that is for them to live surrounded by middle class people. When they do, they generally assimilate.
I actually don't think this is true at all. Maybe in smaller concentrations the voucher holders do less to harm the communities they move into, but overall I don't think that the program is turning enough lives around to justify its existence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 01:49 PM
 
1,182 posts, read 1,139,634 times
Reputation: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
There may be no shame in living in a van but there might be fines and penalties.

What's wroong with my plan? Give landlords more choice. That would eliminate the trash problem.
You cannot legally live in a vehicle. At least not in L.A. County.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 01:55 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,446,691 times
Reputation: 3647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clevelander17 View Post
What are your thoughts on this program? Good or bad?

I've read a few interesting articles about Section 8 recently and it appears that this program, with apparently noble goals, is not working and in fact causing big problems in otherwise decent neighborhoods. What can be done to fix this program? And if the answer is "nothing," how can we get politicians to change this policy?
It's actually a myth that section 8 causes problems in otherwise decent neighborhoods. In fact, the concentration of poverty in housing projects is the problem. As soon as poverty is deconcentrated the crime doesn't simply relocate -- it disappears.

Also the program has hugely cut down on fraud in the past few years and recovered millions from those who defrauded the program
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 01:57 PM
 
5,719 posts, read 6,446,691 times
Reputation: 3647
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
Zoning and NIMBY create artificial supply deficits. Did you really believe a free market in housing exists in this country?
Right. Zoning is the problem. We likely would not need section 8 if towns didn't have exclusive single-family zoning.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 02:01 PM
 
3,281 posts, read 6,276,419 times
Reputation: 2416
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
It's actually a myth that section 8 causes problems in otherwise decent neighborhoods. In fact, the concentration of poverty in housing projects is the problem. As soon as poverty is deconcentrated the crime doesn't simply relocate -- it disappears.

Also the program has hugely cut down on fraud in the past few years and recovered millions from those who defrauded the program
So how does the government deconcentrate the poverty? As of right now, the only communities taking on these voucher-holders are middle class and blue-collar neighborhoods that are being severely adversely-affected by their new neighbors. The upper-middle class and wealthy neighborhoods shoulder none of the burden because there are price barriers, or lack of supply, that prevent voucher-holders from moving in "next door." Middle and working class folks are getting the shaft by a government program that isn't operating nearly as intended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 02:02 PM
 
3,281 posts, read 6,276,419 times
Reputation: 2416
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
Right. Zoning is the problem. We likely would not need section 8 if towns didn't have exclusive single-family zoning.
Can you please expand on this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 02:24 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,451,622 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by juppiter View Post
Right. Zoning is the problem. We likely would not need section 8 if towns didn't have exclusive single-family zoning.

But you and I are the only ones who see the connection between zoning and Section 8. Since the middle class doesn't see the connection, they keep clinging to their zoning and continue bashing Section 8.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-13-2012, 02:32 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,451,622 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruin Rick View Post
You cannot legally live in a vehicle. At least not in L.A. County.

Right, that's why I said there might be fines and penalties.

I was replying to this:

Originally Posted by Dale Cooper
They fix it by getting rid of it. There is no shame in living in a van.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:44 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top