U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-30-2011, 02:36 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,692 posts, read 16,553,209 times
Reputation: 9548

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
Could you provide stats on how many back alley abortions were performed a year prior to Roe V. Wade?

Also how many women died or were seriously injured?

Thanks.

Women are still dying around the world from botched abortions.

But they don't really care about the plight of women in Mozambique or other nations around the world.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2011, 02:37 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,556 posts, read 20,206,653 times
Reputation: 2508
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
Women are still dying around the world from botched abortions.

But they don't really care about the plight of women in Mozambique or other nations around the world.
How many died HERE prior to Roe V. Wade?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2011, 02:37 PM
 
1,067 posts, read 1,518,056 times
Reputation: 1080
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
Could you provide stats on how many back alley abortions were performed a year prior to Roe V. Wade?

Also how many women died or were seriously injured?

Thanks.

Exactly....if abortions werent easily available less woman would want them. AND they would take more precautions not to get pregnant in the first place.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2011, 02:39 PM
 
21,035 posts, read 20,447,282 times
Reputation: 5936
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioChic View Post
Do you know how many people want to adopt!?! And even the ones who dont get adopted im sure will appreciate the fact they are alive"""




HOW do YOU know that????? PROVE it! Prove EVERY ONE is happy.




""" and was given that chance. Their god given right. And if abortion wasnt so readily available then Im sure the "unwanted" pregnancies will see a major decline.
"wasn't so readily available"?

What does THAT mean? Available only to rich women?

To those YOU deem suitable?


First, it always has been available, since pregnancy was first "invented".


Second, why do you wish women to die in back alley abortions? You hate women that much!!!?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2011, 02:40 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,556 posts, read 20,206,653 times
Reputation: 2508
Could anyone provide stats on how many back alley abortions were performed per year prior to Roe V. Wade?

Also how many women died or were seriously injured?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2011, 02:42 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,692 posts, read 16,553,209 times
Reputation: 9548
Quote:
Originally Posted by oz in SC View Post
How many died HERE prior to Roe V. Wade?
Is there something wrong with your google finger?

You don't have servants here buddy...Who made you the King and didn't tell anybody?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2011, 02:46 PM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,556 posts, read 20,206,653 times
Reputation: 2508
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
Is there something wrong with your google finger?

You don't have servants here buddy...Who made you the King and didn't tell anybody?
Well I thought those who use this as a reason to have a million or so legal abortions per year would know.

Guess not.

There must have been a VERY high number to think having a million or so legal abortions(not safe by any means either) was a better alternative.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2011, 02:46 PM
 
21,035 posts, read 20,447,282 times
Reputation: 5936
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioChic View Post
Exactly....if abortions werent easily available less woman would want them."""





Prove it!



"""AND they would take more precautions not to get pregnant in the first place.
Well, that hasn't happened in ten thousand years but you keep wishin' and hopin' for that Utopia you think will magically happen when abortions are outlawed..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2011, 02:47 PM
 
1,067 posts, read 1,518,056 times
Reputation: 1080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Who?Me?! View Post
"wasn't so readily available"?

What does THAT mean? Available only to rich women?

To those YOU deem suitable?


First, it always has been available, since pregnancy was first "invented".


Second, why do you wish women to die in back alley abortions? You hate women that much!!!?

You know what your right im sure there are thousands of people in the world who sit and think darn it I wish my mom would have gotten an abortion. But what about the MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of babies who dont get to sit and wonder that? What about the babies who werent given a chance?

And second YES I HATE THEM! THEY ARE BABY KILLERS! They should die along with their unborn CHILD. And when I say "available" I mean: if woman knew they didnt have the "choice" to kill their child then they would do more to prevent said child. Not oh well we dont need to use a condom because it wont feel the same and if I get pregnant I can go down to planned parenthood and kill my baby at minimal charge to me.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2011, 02:51 PM
 
5,352 posts, read 6,508,727 times
Reputation: 2727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldawg82 View Post
It is an obvious legal contradiction that no one will answer because it forces us to say that it is a woman's choice to decide if a child lives or dies and that the child's life is less important than the right of that woman to make this decision.
That's the way it's always been - it's the whole issue behind freedom of choice. There are two competing rights - the rights of the mother, and the rights of the baby developing inside her. Current law opts to side with the rights of the born at the expense of the rights of the unborn. It's no secret. Some people can deal with that reality, others find it so uncomfortable that they'd prefer to force women they don't even know to carry to term against the pregnant woman's wishes.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2021, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top