Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-04-2011, 07:58 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,692,979 times
Reputation: 22474

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by KRAMERCAT View Post
Corporations are targeting water as the next privatized commodity. They are building desalination plants which traditionally rely on fossile fuels. Are there any projects underway to use tidal power to run desalination plants? Wouldn't that make sense?
What I think would make sense would be to kill two birds with one stone. For example the Mississippi River seems prone to flooding, why not divert some of the excess water and pipe it out West instead?

All the water ends up going to the ocean in the end but could be used to irrigate and refill reservoirs before it does.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-04-2011, 11:24 AM
 
4,538 posts, read 4,811,230 times
Reputation: 1549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Economics201 View Post
Where are the "wars" you are talking about?
Euphemism for corporate privitization of water, which is already occuring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2011, 11:28 AM
 
4,538 posts, read 4,811,230 times
Reputation: 1549
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
What I think would make sense would be to kill two birds with one stone. For example the Mississippi River seems prone to flooding, why not divert some of the excess water and pipe it out West instead?

All the water ends up going to the ocean in the end but could be used to irrigate and refill reservoirs before it does.
I think the cost of building the pipes would be exhorbitant, plus the flooding 'problem' appears to have a political agenda attached.

"the federal government is sending out letters to all of the flooded out farmers in the Missouri River flood plain and bottoms notifying them that the Army Corps of Engineers will offer to BUY THEIR LAND.
Intentionally flood massive acreage of highly productive farmground. Destroy people’s communities and homes. Catch them while they are desperate and afraid and then swoop in and buy the ground cheap. Those evil sons of *******."

Look Who
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2011, 11:45 AM
 
629 posts, read 771,729 times
Reputation: 364
Two words

Lake Superior!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-04-2011, 11:57 AM
 
118 posts, read 87,322 times
Reputation: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRAMERCAT View Post
Euphemism for corporate privitization of water, which is already occuring.
It's a bad euphenism.

War is an act of the public sector.

Privitization is an act of the private sector.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2011, 06:23 PM
 
4,538 posts, read 4,811,230 times
Reputation: 1549
Quote:
Originally Posted by Economics201 View Post
It's a bad euphenism.

War is an act of the public sector.

Privitization is an act of the private sector.
It's a forward-looking euphemism - corporate privatization of water is not a 'war' per se, until it becomes clear that 'our water is under their soil', at which time it will be war, and as is the case with oil, that day is coming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2011, 08:02 PM
 
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
11,155 posts, read 29,316,613 times
Reputation: 5479
canada and the US share thae largest fresh water reserves in the world with the great lakes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2011, 08:24 PM
 
2,673 posts, read 3,248,069 times
Reputation: 1996
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
What I think would make sense would be to kill two birds with one stone. For example the Mississippi River seems prone to flooding, why not divert some of the excess water and pipe it out West instead?

All the water ends up going to the ocean in the end but could be used to irrigate and refill reservoirs before it does.
I highly recommend you read the book, Cadillac Desert. It is known as being one of the best researched, and well crafted non-fiction books that deal with water. It provides so much history over water in the West, the politics behind it, the billions of dollars spent (or wasted in many cases) on the damning craze between the 30's - 60's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-05-2011, 09:16 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,450,574 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by KRAMERCAT View Post
Thanks - I really think that the coming water shortage needs to be addressed with renewable energy sources, and hopefully the tidal powered generators can be perfected to that end.
What water shortage? We have all the fresh water we could ever want in Alaska. Nice clean glacial water. In fact, it is so clean that the EPA once threatened Anchorage with a $3 million fine if they did not remove the particulates from the city's drinking water. The only problem was that there are no particulates in Anchorage's drinking water. The city had to dump several tons of fish waste into the water just so it could be removed and be in compliance with the morons at the EPA.

You lower-48ers can stick with your pricey bottled tap-water, we will stick to our free water from glacier fed lakes, rivers, and streams.

Drink up!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-06-2011, 07:56 AM
 
Location: The Ranch in Olam Haba
23,707 posts, read 30,745,228 times
Reputation: 9985
Quote:
It's a forward-looking euphemism - corporate privatization of water is not a 'war' per se, until it becomes clear that 'our water is under their soil', at which time it will be war, and as is the case with oil, that day is coming.
This issue may come to fruition when those of us who have private wells start getting meters for water usage. It may become similar to not having mineral rights under your own private land.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top