Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No, that is actually completely untrue and the opposite of what I was saying.
Blacks are roughly 10% of the pop. and are involved in about 20% of the hate crimes which is roughly in proportion to the general crime rate.
Google FBI hate crime statistics it's all there.
That doesn't prove anything. You have to look at the actual number of crimes committed, and then compare that to the number of hate crimes. You can't just look at population.
Also, it all depends on how many of the crimes are actually hate crimes. It could still be off no matter what the percentages charged. Which there's no way for us to tell.
That doesn't prove anything. You have to look at the actual number of crimes committed, and then compare that to the number of hate crimes. You can't just look at population.
Also, it all depends on how many of the crimes are actually hate crimes. It could still be off no matter what the percentages charged. Which there's no way for us to tell.
My point was in rebuttal to the claim that blacks don't get charged with hate crimes because they are black.
Since they are charged in about 20% of hate crimes I disagree with your assertion bolded above.
My point was in rebuttal to the claim that blacks don't get charged with hate crimes because they are black.
Since they are charged in about 20% of hate crimes I disagree with your assertion bolded above.
I didn't say they were never charged. I don't see how that proves anything but the fact that they are sometimes charged. Please explain.
Edit. They make up 13% of the population. So what? Do they commit 13% of the crime? No. So you've proven nothing. And even if they did, that still doesn't prove which ones were hate crimes.
In bad areas EVERYBODY gets robbed. The idea that blacks are just lurking around looking for whites to rob is just flat wrong and backed up by crime statistics as well. When someone is out looking to mug someone they aren't checking a sherwin-williams color tone guide, they are going to mug the guys with the nice shoes, some jewelry on....preferably drunk. Easy mark, easy cash.
bull****, back on page three someone gave dozens of links that showed many gangs of blacks are specifically targeting white to beat and rob, specifically whites.
get down off your high-horse of political correctness
bull****, back on page three someone gave dozens of links that showed many gangs of blacks are specifically targeting white to beat and rob, specifically whites.
get down off your high-horse of political correctness
It's all right here. These kind of youth are only out on the streets to attack non-blacks, plain and simple. Some have even admitted to it, but the liberal spin is that although their only aim is to beat/rob asians, hispanics, indians, or whites they are still not RACIST. In their own words they say it's easy to victimize non-blacks because they are weaker or defenseless and carry a lot of money. Now imagine if someone from a different group said they only go after blacks because they are not intelligent enough, or they go after jews because they always have money. Immediately we would consider it racist. But for some reason blacks are exempt from responsibility no matter what atrocities happen.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.