Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obama, within the first 1.5 years in office, exceeded all 8 years of combined US casualties in Afghanistan under Bush.
He is just another liberal freak, like Clinton, who utterly despises the military, and is doing his best to get as many as possible killed.
Now it is getting childish. Obama is trying to get as many as possible killed? Really?
If the goal of a military campaign to make sure no one gets killed, then you might as well surrender to the enemy and beg them to spare your life.
Now it is getting childish. Obama is trying to get as many as possible killed? Really?
If the goal of a military campaign to make sure no one gets killed, then you might as well surrender to the enemy and beg them to spare your life.
If you kill more US soldiers in less than 2 years than the previous President did in 8 years, then it can only be because you are intentionally trying to get as many killed as possible. This is common practice among liberal freaks, just ask Clinton and LBJ.
Obama, within the first 1.5 years in office, exceeded all 8 years of combined US casualties in Afghanistan under Bush.
He is just another liberal freak, like Clinton, who utterly despises the military, and is doing his best to get as many as possible killed.
Wait, so you think that Obama hates the military and he is continuing the War in Afghanistan because he wants soldiers to die? Does that make Bush a liberal who hates the military as well? Does that make the conservatives who call for war liberal freaks who despise the military as well? Obama is just too cowardly or other wise coopted to withdraw from combat, he doesn't enjoy seeing servicemen killed.
If you kill more US soldiers in less than 2 years than the previous President did in 8 years, then it can only be because you are intentionally trying to get as many killed as possible. This is common practice among liberal freaks, just ask Clinton and LBJ.
Playing the war half-a**ed with Taliban peace talks and deals with Karzai get you this slaughter, not to mention shifting numbers against your generals' advice just to win some political points with the anti-war crowd. Either you pull out (preferred) or you destroy the enemy with no mercy.
Playing the war half-a**ed with Taliban peace talks and deals with Karzai get you this slaughter, not to mention shifting numbers against your generals' advice just to win some political points with the anti-war crowd. Either you pull out (preferred) or you destroy the enemy with no mercy.
Wait, so do you agree with the contention that Obama is intentionally getting soldiers killed or not?
If you kill more US soldiers in less than 2 years than the previous President did in 8 years, then it can only be because you are intentionally trying to get as many killed as possible. This is common practice among liberal freaks, just ask Clinton and LBJ.
If you are talking about US soldiers, then surely you made a serious attempt to add Iraq and Afghanistan deaths on Bush's numbers? Yes? No?
So, are you now going to accuse Bush the same way as you accused Obama? I will not, because I like I said, it is childish.
Wait, so you think that Obama hates the military and he is continuing the War in Afghanistan because he wants soldiers to die? Does that make Bush a liberal who hates the military as well? Does that make the conservatives who call for war liberal freaks who despise the military as well? Obama is just too cowardly or other wise coopted to withdraw from combat, he doesn't enjoy seeing servicemen killed.
Funny how when Democrats become President the casualty rate for US troops always increases by a factor of four or more. Obviously only Republican Presidents have any concern for our troop's well-being, and Democrat Presidents prefer them dead in large numbers.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
