Another homosexual victory: Illinois severs foster-care ties with Catholic Charities (illegal, Christmas)

[hammertime33]

Originally Posted by nicet4

Link to all my many anti-homosexual threads?

I didn't think so.

Here are just a few from a very quick search of your posting history:

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...l#post13078703
//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...l#post12250839
//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...l#post16206007
//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...l#post16345359

My two favorite are

"Homosexuality is not natural, it's disgusting, perverted and wrong.Why should I even want to deal with it?"

and

"The militant, radical homosexual crowd is a scary thing to behold their actions being reminiscent of Nazi thugs in 1933 Germany."

[AnUnidentifiedMale]

Religious organizations shouldn't be funded by the state to begin with. I think they should have a right to discriminate against same-sex couples all they want - as long as they aren't taking taxpayer dollars to stay in business.

[hammertime33]

Originally Posted by Yeledaf

Look at it this way: it's like discharging a soldier from the military for being openly gay. Legal, but according to some, morally wrong.

The law and justice rarely intersect. And these latest moves to secularize our country by punishing the childen is clearly craven and immoral.

Our government is secular. It's separate from religion.

One man's morality is another man's immorality.

[nicet4]

Originally Posted by hammertime33

Here are just a few from a very quick search of your posting history:

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...l#post13078703
//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...l#post12250839
//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...l#post16206007
//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...l#post16345359

My two favorite are

"Homosexuality is not natural, it's disgusting, perverted and wrong.Why should I even want to deal with it?"

and

"The militant, radical homosexual crowd is a scary thing to behold their actions being reminiscent of Nazi thugs in 1933 Germany."

And I stand by what I said.

It just isn't natural.

[KUchief25]

Originally Posted by hammertime33

Really? 2500 children tossed out into the streets because the state is changing contractors?

If you have any clue how difficult it is to place children then you wouldn't be so happy. Make sure you toss em a sandwich when you walk by and spit on em on the street.

[AnUnidentifiedMale]

Originally Posted by nicet4

And I stand by what I said.

That's fine. You're free to hold whatever fringe opinions you wish to hold. The majority of people would find them extreme.

[KUchief25]

Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale

That's fine. You're free to hold whatever fringe opinions you wish to hold. The majority of people would find them extreme.

I don't think that's a "fringe" opinion at all.

[hammertime33]

Originally Posted by KUchief25

If you have any clue how difficult it is to place children then you wouldn't be so happy. Make sure you toss em a sandwich when you walk by and spit on em on the street.

What makes you think they'll be removed from the homes they are currently in?

[Yeledaf]

Originally Posted by hammertime33

Our government is secular. It's separate from religion.

That is one interpretation of the Constitution. There are others. It most certainly has nothing to do with the education of inner-city children or the adoption of children in the state of Illinois, since neither teaching arithmetic or providing foster families involves Congress passing a law regarding the establishment of religion.

One man's morality is another man's immorality.

Non sequitur.

[nicet4]

Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale

That's fine. You're free to hold whatever fringe opinions you wish to hold. The majority of people would find them extreme.

Sort of like the minority extremist fringe group in California that voted against homosexual "marriages"?

California Votes for Prop 8 - WSJ.com