Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-18-2011, 01:34 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by brentwoodgirl View Post
The government chose to take people's money on the promise of paying it back. They don't get to decide now that they want to keep it. If they realize now the ponzi scheme isn't working, then stop the scheme and finish paying your obligations.
I'm in my 30s and self employed. I got the pleasure of paying 12.4% of my income to SS last year, and I have no doubt I will never see that money back.
Like the rest of us working stiffs. Who cares if you're self-employed or not? Who cares how old you are? You didn't pay in with the promise that you'd get your money back. You paid in so that your grandparents and parents would have a financial security net when they retired. You hoped that the people following you into the job market would pay in so that one day you would have that financial security net. The demographics of the baby boom mean that the financial security net as originally designed won't be there for you or me, but in all likelihood, it will be re-designed in some way for us. It probably won't be sufficient, we probably will complain about how insufficient it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-18-2011, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentwoodgirl View Post
The government chose to take people's money on the promise of paying it back. They don't get to decide now that they want to keep it. If they realize now the ponzi scheme isn't working, then stop the scheme and finish paying your obligations.
I'm in my 30s and self employed. I got the pleasure of paying 12.4% of my income to SS last year, and I have no doubt I will never see that money back.
Off topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 01:37 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Why is SS such a huge expenditure? Could it be becase FDR had an idea that didn't pan out...
What? A socialist plan that didn't pan out?

Say it isn't so!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 01:40 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
This despicable act by 0bama should be a wake-up call for all Americans, when government controls your life, as they do with SS checks and Medicare, they have the power to act like tyrants, and hold a figurative gun to your head
Many are taking note thanks to Obama's threat, but it's far too late. The government has already taken workers' hard-earned money for DECADES.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 01:44 PM
 
5,064 posts, read 5,730,610 times
Reputation: 4770
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Like the rest of us working stiffs. Who cares if you're self-employed or not? Who cares how old you are? You didn't pay in with the promise that you'd get your money back. You paid in so that your grandparents and parents would have a financial security net when they retired. You hoped that the people following you into the job market would pay in so that one day you would have that financial security net. The demographics of the baby boom mean that the financial security net as originally designed won't be there for you or me, but in all likelihood, it will be re-designed in some way for us. It probably won't be sufficient, we probably will complain about how insufficient it is.
Actually no, I hope the people following me do not have to pay in. Social Security is not viable in its current state. The government needs to completely reform it. I'm not counting on the government to provide my financial security net, not now and not when I retire. We ensure our own financial security by spending responsibly and saving well.

And being self-employed means I pay more than non-self employed people for SS. For 2011, employees pay 4.2% into Social Security, and employers pay 6.2%. Self employed people have to pay both sides, so in 2011, I'm paying 10.4% of my income into SS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 01:47 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,274,487 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
What? A socialist plan that didn't pan out?

Say it isn't so!
I won't say that at all. Since the Congress has admitted that they owe over $3 trillion to the SS fund I would say that the original plan worked very well or would have if politicians could stand to see money sitting around unspent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 01:47 PM
 
608 posts, read 1,346,840 times
Reputation: 469
“Work to keep the government open, unless it requires breaking your word to the American people and giving up your principles,” he says. “Becoming one more promise-breaking, Washington-dominated, sellout group is a much worse fate — politically and ethically — than having the government close for a few days.”
--Newt

And you saw how well that worked out for him!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 01:47 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,029 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13715
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
You didn't pay in with the promise that you'd get your money back.
Directly contradicted by the handy dandy "Social Security Statement" we get in the mail periodically.
Quote:
According to the SSA, your benefits will be there for you when you retire.
http://fc.standardandpoors.com/sites...191&topic=5034
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 01:49 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,274,487 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentwoodgirl View Post
Actually no, I hope the people following me do not have to pay in. Social Security is not viable in its current state. The government needs to completely reform it. I'm not counting on the government to provide my financial security net, not now and not when I retire. We ensure our own financial security by spending responsibly and saving well.

And being self-employed means I pay more than non-self employed people for SS. For 2011, employees pay 4.2% into Social Security, and employers pay 6.2%. Self employed people have to pay both sides, so in 2011, I'm paying 10.4% of my income into SS.
You missed that one. Both employers and the employed pay the same amount and it has been 6% plus for years and years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-18-2011, 01:51 PM
 
3,681 posts, read 6,275,166 times
Reputation: 1516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirdik View Post
That comment was an attempt by Obama to blackmail the nation.
Just imagine how easy for them it will be to blackmail us when they have full control over our healthcare system.
They'll be able to get anything by threatening to sop funding certain healthcare programs.
Sure sounds like it, doesn't it. It is really time to stop the madness and tyranny of big government before it is too late.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:53 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top