Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:14 PM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,951,643 times
Reputation: 2618

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
You are seriously overreaching and over reacting.
I am not the one who posted a link calling people "deniers". You did.

 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:19 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
The issue is not that it is not hot.

The issue is claiming this heat is unprecedented.

The blocking high we have had is not abnormal. The temps that are being reported are not the outrageous and as was pointed out, did not break many records unless one deviously attempts to manipulate the issue which is why the argument of "heat index" is being misused at times to claim records that have not been made.
Wrong. 2100 records so far in July have been matched or broken. Not heat index records. Plain old temperature readings.
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:22 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,125,541 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
The topic is not "climate change" in a vague term. It is the heat wave, which is a more specific topic in its relation to "climate change".

Ocean Acidification is a very specific sub topic just as heat waves are. As I said, if you wish to discuss this issue specifically, start a thread concerning it.

OR...

specifically relate your information directly to that of the topic "heat waves" in your own words rather than being insulting with links that call people deniers and condescendingly dismiss them.
From the OP...

Quote:
Of course, when they add in the stupid "heat index", the hyperventilating gets even worse. This is just another example of the ridiculous sensationalism of the media, with the underlying meme of "global warming" of course.
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:29 PM
 
857 posts, read 2,002,524 times
Reputation: 550
Was about to type it all out myself, but this basically explains the whole thing:

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbmsu01 View Post
These articles are horribly misleading. It talks about that very few stations set all-time record highs (like the warmest reading ever on any date.) But it tries to make it look like they were talking about daily record highs. If you check the database, there were tons of them set between July 17-23, a lot more than the 14 that these blogs claim.

It's ridiculously difficult to set an all-time record high, and the heat wave isn't going to affect all stations equally. So 0.4% over a week is an astonishingly high number.

It's obvious that they have an agenda to make it look like global warming isn't happening; that the heat wave is all manufactured media hype. The ironic thing is that you can't blame an individual heat wave on global warming anyway, so their argument is a moot point.
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,944,793 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Wrong. 2100 records so far in July have been matched or broken. Not heat index records. Plain old temperature readings.
I'm sorry, but have you posted a working link that proves this claim? Until you do, it's bogus......there is no such record.

Last edited by sanrene; 07-25-2011 at 12:41 PM..
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,481,831 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Wrong. 2100 records so far in July have been matched or broken. Not heat index records. Plain old temperature readings.
Not yet in Texas and I certainly hope we don't break this record.

120 degrees in 1936 and 1994.
Texas weather records
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:33 PM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,381,706 times
Reputation: 10254
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
Obviously the underlying issue of the OP is to debunk climate change and the effects of it and the issue of it being caused by humans or not. My question is how would one debunk the acidification of the oceans because the two are intertwined as any intlligent person is well aware of.

Ocean acidification: Why the climate change deniers don't want to talk about it
Ocean acidification: Why the climate change deniers don't want to talk about it | Energy Bulletin

you mean the very minor shifts in very limited areas of the PH of the oceans?

"Ocean Acidification" as a term is really an inflamatory exageration. The oceans are not becoming acidic. that would be IMPOSSIBLE.

However, because of CO2 rise, and the ocean's ability to absorb CO2, yes there is a minor shift that has taken place in some areas. NOT all areas and none of the scientific literature proves this to be seriously dangerous. There have been some studies using spurious methods to lower PH that suggest some danger however, when those metods are put to the test, they do not reflect what is happening in nature.

and that has nothing to do with temerature. different subtopic entirely.
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,944,793 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Originally Posted by Factsplease View Post
This is just silly. Some people will be sitting in the middle of an inferno, cursing Al Gore and saying it isn't that hot. Sheesh.
Of course it's hot. It's summer..in the NE.....South.

But they Gwarmists and MSM would like us to believe the temperatures are out of the norm....they are not.

If .4% of records falling is to be determined a "record breaking heat wave".....they look like fools...again.
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:38 PM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,381,706 times
Reputation: 10254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecovlke View Post
One reason is because of forcings. And here's a link for ya:
http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/TBA--LTonly.pdf

(say thank you for the great link)

I suggest reading the entire paper, but the 2nd column, bottom of page 160 and on to page 162 discusses forcers.

And if you want to know the author's credentials:

Lonnie Thompson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

However:
This thread is about a heat wave in the summer of 2011. It is not supposed to be a thread about the very real and increasingly well documented changing climate.

I have read LOTs on forcing. and guess what, the forcing predicted by the models doesnt exist in the actual record.

It is a complicated subject, but not one single paper exists that shows full proof that forcing is causeing a spiraling of temperature. In fact, there is record of Pro-AGW scientists talking to each other about the fact that they cannot find it and how unfortunate that is.
 
Old 07-25-2011, 12:43 PM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,381,706 times
Reputation: 10254
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Wrong. 2100 records so far in July have been matched or broken. Not heat index records. Plain old temperature readings.

2100 out of how many?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:09 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top