Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To call the Washington Times "a conservative paper," insults conservative papers that present the news but have conservative editorial boards. The Washington Times is a propaganda paper, that slants the news to fit its agenda -- which is what propaganda is.
Likewise, the New York Times is a liberal paper but presents the news in a factual and objective manner but has a liberal editorial board.
The Wall Street Journal used to be a conservative paper whose articles one could trust factual accuracy. Since Murdock bought it, one can no longer trust it the way one used to.
The Washington Times is characterizing differences of opinion as "lies." What undercuts Mr. Boehner's claim that he didn't walk away from negotiations is the fact that he walked away from negotiations.
It's funny how in your post those news outlets that you disagree with are propaganda outlets and slant the news. While those that you agree with (while doing exactly the same thing for the side you choose to support) are fair and objective. Couldn't be your personal bias, could it?
Explain the facts instead of simply pointing at a source. You shall get what you deserve... a spanking.
I think a spanking will just encourages Republicans:
Quote:
The "family values" Republican National Committee spent almost $2,000 last month at an erotic, bondage-themed West Hollywood club, where nearly naked women - and men - simulate sex in nets hung from above.
The RNC's risqu business expense covered a night out at the high-end S&M club Voyeur Feb. 4, Federal Election Commission records filed by the RNC show. link
Could be.
The Obama bashers are definitely pathological liars.
You get that sort of thing anytime you have a bad president. Look at the anti-Bush crowd. Now, we have an even worse president, so it's natural the boo-birds will come out.
The Washington Times is characterizing differences of opinion as "lies."
Examples of real lies by politicians are as follows:
* Bush stating that there were WMD in Iraq.
* Bush stating that we don't wiretap without a court order.
* Don Rumsfeld stating we know where WMD is in Iraq.
* Randy Hopper says Democrat challenger Jessica King voted to increase her pay 63 percent.
* Herman Cain saying, "I did not say that I would not have them [Muslims] in my Cabinet."
How about stating that he will close Gitmo immediately?
How about we need to pass a stimulus immediately or face economic disaster?
Well, that will be a lie to those who lack a basic understanding of the Government system in the USA.
Try real hard to see reality. Did 0bama say he would close it immediately or not? Did he close it? Lacking a basic understanding would seem to be your forte.
Quote:
How is that a lie?
Being a true believer and blinded by his aurora, I would not expect you to be able to tell.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
