Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How about some more math?... How much of the stimulus was tax cuts for the top 1 percent?... ... You neocon shills always leave out that part...
What the hell does that have to do with the FEDs? Ignoring of course the fact that the tax cuts gave a greater cut to everyone else.. If you dont comprehend that those who make the most get larger cuts in real dollars, then perhapse you failed 5th grade math.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HC475
You left out the part that it all started under the George Bush watch...
Bills written by who? Werent we told by Democrats that the world wide economy would collapse if government doesnt stimuluate? We're still being told that.. so you whine about it on one hand, while callint for it on another.
What the hell does that have to do with the FEDs? Ignoring of course the fact that the tax cuts gave a greater cut to everyone else.. If you dont comprehend that those who make the most get larger cuts in real dollars, then perhapse you failed 5th grade math.
Right wing deflecting are we?... Why are Boehner and Cantor walking off like babies?... Because they're fired if they don't...
"As a result of this audit, we now know that the Federal Reserve provided more than $16 trillion in total financial assistance to some of the largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world," he said. "This is a clear case of socialism for the rich, and rugged, you're-on-your-own individualism for everyone else." Well, didn't everyone know that by now?
The currency is owned by the US Department of Treasury, but its managed by the Feds on public money, but private money put in by the banks get a 6% rate of return when they loan money to the fed. This is why we capital is so tight, why loan money to the public at 5.5% when you can get 6% from the FED.
They dont need to tell people where their money is going.. Do you?
When did the banks loan the FR money and get a 6% return? That does not sound like how the game is played. Do you have info? this is the first time I have heard this.
I'm deeply offended you even mentioned Republicans in the same line as socialists.
Give me a break.
I think the original author used the word to try to get GOP idiots to start realiging what is really going on..
Our government is controlled by large financial corporations. This is corporate sponsored state-ism. Using tired old terms like "socialist" and "capitalist" don't work with what is going on now. Goldman Sachs steering the countries economic policy to make the extremely wealthy even wealthier has very little in common with eco101 bananna stand salesman anecdotes that Fox News worshippers try to equate everything to in their foolishness.
Right wing deflecting are we?... Why are Boehner and Cantor walking off like babies?... Because they're fired if they don't...
Actually you are the one who deflected into tax cuts from your own thread of "Republican Puppets", while ignoring that Democrats have held Congress since 2007. Whats the matter, cant substantiate the link so you have to change the subject?
I think the original author used the word to try to get GOP idiots to start realiging what is really going on..
Our government is controlled by large financial corporations. This is corporate sponsored state-ism. Using tired old terms like "socialist" and "capitalist" don't work with what is going on now. Goldman Sachs steering the countries economic policy to make the extremely wealthy even wealthier has very little in common with eco101 bananna stand salesman anecdotes that Fox News worshippers try to equate everything to in their foolishness.
So anotherwords, the original author lied, and played partisan bs "keywords", to get people to understand only half the truth while ignoring and deflecting when someone points out the other half? Got it
Why do republicans provide cover for the totalitarian banks?...
Because the banks give them a cut... Too obvious.
Better look at the number of individuals in the Obama administration who have held positions at Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan before you cast stones falsely accusing the GOP as supporting big banks and the Democrats as not. I'm quite certain that Democrats under Clinton and Obama have been all about supporting the big banks.
"As a result of this audit, we now know that the Federal Reserve provided more than $16 trillion in total financial assistance to some of the largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world," he said. "This is a clear case of socialism for the rich, and rugged, you're-on-your-own individualism for everyone else." Well, didn't everyone know that by now?
Wow, and to think the republicans accomplished this while the inconsequential and inept dems ran the entire government for two years, and controlled the congress and senate for four years.
Wow, just wow.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
... You neocon shills always leave out that part... 
