Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-26-2011, 08:32 AM
 
59,059 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14283

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Please wait until after I am dead in 30 years or so.

The reason these programs exist is the private sector CANNOT BE TRUSTED with the small investor's money. It is a near certainty that the small investor’s stock accounts will be lost in a speculative crash and their bank accounts will disappear when the banks suffer a massive failure. A long history of booms and busts has provided evidence of this behavior by the private sector.

The only thing that you would do with the extra 15% is spend it or lose it in and economic failure. Either way you would spend your elderly years destitute.

Keep these programs government operated. They are our only real security even if threatened by Mammon’s purists.
Hint, there are more options then just stocks.

You make claims. How about some date on the the record of investment in this country.

My IRA is doing fine. Even with the last crash, mine is worth more then what I have put into it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-26-2011, 08:40 AM
 
59,059 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14283
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
I trust private charity about as much as I trust the private business sector. That is somewhere between very little and not at all.
Said from a guy who tried to start his own private sector business. So, you don't trust yourself?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2011, 08:43 AM
 
59,059 posts, read 27,306,837 times
Reputation: 14283
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie View Post
He "addressed" it but didn't give much energy to it... he was really apathetic to it otherwise he would do more than "address" it... To his benefit, he was short-sighted and thought everything would turn out okay in the end... it didn't... hindsight is 20/20... foresight is a different matter entirely... I am sure if you talked to him back then you will find that he was concerned but not overly concerned as he should of been... but then I also have the advantage of hindsight... I didn't know this was going on back then so I would of been just as stupid about the whole ordeal... but Bush was in the loop and was apathetic to it... apathy is no excuse...
You really need to read up on the history of the issue. The facts seem to escape you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2011, 08:43 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by jefffla01 View Post
Lets cut and reduce the billions and billions of squandered foreign aid every year. Let also reduce spending on the numerous wars, regional conflicts, and police actions we are involved in.

Yes indeed it is time to make significant changes to entitlement programs---to destroy them--no.

There is plenty of room to compromise on all this---its time to end this joke---it has become a dog and pony show and whole world is laughing at us. It is also clear that the American people have become fed up and disgusted over this political soap opera.

To all our elected officials----just do your job repsonsibly and without allegiance to ideological jargon and nonsense. Just do the right thing which is to start to make significant dent in the debt and start now----but please do not cause this govt to default and jeopardize the international community.

Raise the debt limit----than create a respected commission of dems and repubs to form a binding committee to come up with a workable solution to the debt problem. Give them power to have the findings implemented----I dont think a solution can be found under the current situation where idealogy and arrogance is more important than meeting our obligations and future challenges.


We have a committee, it is called the House of Representatives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2011, 08:45 AM
 
22,768 posts, read 30,733,597 times
Reputation: 14745
you want to phase out what little social safety net we have, but keep all the little perks for the bankers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2011, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,759,995 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by hnsq View Post
I think you are confused. I have not moved my 'goalpost' whatsoever. I stated that there is no factual evidence showing a drop in mortality rates since the enactment of medicare and you told me I was wrong without backing yourself up. Not only am I right in my original post, but you cannot give me any evidence that I am wrong! Instead of posting the factual data that I asked for, you become vindictive? I am asking you to actually give facts to back up what you said. Is that really too much to ask?

Katiana - as usual you attack me personally instead of posting facts. Either back up your claims with facts or back out of the discussion.
This statement of yours:

Also, if you look at mortality rates in the United States over time, you do not see any drop whatsoever after the enactment of medicare.

is untrue. Life expectancies have been posted all over this board, but since you want to make me go to the extra work, here it is:

http://aging.senate.gov/crs/aging1.pdf

Can't copy, you'll have to acutally look at it.

Last edited by CaseyB; 07-26-2011 at 02:30 PM.. Reason: off topic/personal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2011, 08:49 AM
 
23,974 posts, read 15,082,290 times
Reputation: 12952
You guys who have years to grow your investments better do some strategic long rang planning. It was not too long ago some relatives of mine saved and saved and thought they could get by on the interest. They are now eating their seed corn. It will not last as long as they do. Others thought they would be fine invested in the stock market. Never forget Enron. Ken Lay was treated as a hero by the establishment in Texas until the bitter end.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2011, 08:52 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
I agree with foreign aid, but not with military spending.

After all, our government has a constitutional duty of defense.
It's time it learns the difference between defense and asinine, unnecessary wars of choices that are offensive in every sense of the word.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2011, 08:52 AM
 
532 posts, read 1,270,413 times
Reputation: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
SS cost you 7.5% and your employer 7.5% of every dollar earned.

Imagine having the freedom of choice to use that 15% to plan your own retirement?

The left are only for choice when it comes to killing babies.
I'd love it! Add my SS contributions plus interest in to my retirement portfolio and I would move my retirement date up 10 years.

What about the veteran who lost his legs in combat. The child born with disabilities unable to make a living as an adult or the hard working professional who contracted MS or another debilitating condition in his 30's. Do we turn our backs and say tough luck, I got mine?

How 'bout we take a more reasonable look at this shall we? We spend almost as much on defense as the rest of the world combined. Maybe we can save a buck or two there.

Look at the medical industry. Anyone else see a problem with American's paying more for prescription drugs than anywhere else in the world? Why is the selling price of a pill cost $1 in Canada cost $3 in the US when they are manufactured and sold by the same company. Ya we're being ripped off.

Social programs need to be gutted too. How often are programs evaluated for productivity, or audited for fiscal viability? Taking away a program, regardless of how ineffective is political suicide. You'll get far more votes from your constituents getting a larger piece of the pie for a local program than closing one.

We don't need new taxes nor do we need to get rid of the safety nets. What we need to do is ban the interaction with the lobbyist and special interests. Evaluate what it means to be ethical in Washington. Any politician in bed with a special interest to secure personal wealth after leaving office should be jailed.

We need patriots not politicians. How about allowing only one term for senior elected officials. They will spend less time appeasing everybody to get elected again and more time doing the job they were elected to do. While we're at it can we get rid of the Democrat's and Rebublican's too? So much rhetoric along party lines, make you wonder If love of country takes a back seat to love of party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-26-2011, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,958 posts, read 75,192,887 times
Reputation: 66918
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
Start now with new workers entering the workforce.
Sounds great! Now ... What are you replacing it with?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Majin View Post
Socialist marxist liberal pinko maoist.
LMAO!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nomander View Post
Seek charity, there is plenty of it and let the private society be their benefactors.
Sounds great! How much are you going to pony up?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dunks_galore View Post
It even sounds nice for those of you who simply want smaller government, until you realize how much this would destroy the social fabric of our country, making it far more difficult for the non-wealthy to get ahead in life and increasing the power of the people who already control our nation.
And I wonder how many of those folks ever received a federally backed college loan or grant, bought a house with an FHA loan or first-time homeownership program, had a grandparent or parent in a nursing home ...

Yes ... Government assistance is truly evil. Unless you're the one receiving it, right?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top