Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The article also said there was a contract and they didn't fulfill their obligations on that contract, feel free to double-check me.
Right. I was making a comment to another poster as we were talking about the 14 day cancellation policy. If there was another contract, we need to know about it before we can make a proper assessment of the situation. We are not like liberals who jump to conclusions about anything and everything.
it depends on what the cancellation policy of the hotel is, and when the reservations were cancelled. the property might get the cost of the rooms, but it wont get the interest in the lawsuit. and if the cancellation policy was followed properly, then the hotel get nothing.
Right. I was making a comment to another poster as we were talking about the 14 day cancellation policy. If there was another contract, we need to know about it before we can make a proper assessment of the situation. We are not like liberals who jump to conclusions about anything and everything.
LOL!!!
All right. I concede the "fact" that although there was a contract...maybe there was a conspiracy and there's another contract hidden away somewhere.
Because often, people will sign two different contracts. Because, uh...just because.
According to the article they didn't actually get anything, did you even read the story before making ignorant statements like the one above?
Who cares? Their failure to show cost the hotel money. The hotel appears to have been clever enough to plan for this eventuality and put a cancellation clause in the contract. No money was forthcoming, so it's time to meet with a judge. Whether they "got anything" is irrelevant.
Is this similar to a birth certificate...? Just wondering.
Or perhaps "they" meant "different contract" as in, the reporter lied, in conspiracy with the Naughty Left, to misrepresent what the contract really said. Plus the time frame for the cancellation policy, plus the date of the cancellation itself.
(nodding) (winking) I hear ya, bro. That's how they getcha.
No...that was the joke...as in, "tea party" would be as much of an insult as "retard"...I guess it was too subtle.
Yea I knew what you were doing, lmao I figured it was a good time to use the term as an example without getting reported.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
