Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well then why is Obama trying to get them another big amnesty? Everyone knows that when you reward them by coming illegally, it not only encourages more to come illegally to get in on this and the next big amnesty but sets off a big family chain migration, where all the long lost relatives now begin to join their newly amnestied relatives.
But also the whole reason so many are coming to the USA - even legally - is their have children they cannot feed otherwise. That's why our immigration from countries with very high birth rates is so high.
Oh, gosh. I don't know. Maybe the same reason Reagan did. You didn't have a rebuttal to my comment by the way. A ready market for cheap labor is why we have 15 million Mexican, Central and South American illegal immigrants (and they're progeny). You know it, I know it, everyone knows it. Liberal sympathy once they're here didn't cause that.
Here's just one example of the big rewards being planned for any and all who get over the border illegally. And of course they will be able to start bringing in all their long-lost loved ones.
In fact Obama kicked off his 2012 campaign at the Mexican border itself making big promises to get a big amnesty through. How much more can a liberal promote uncontrolled immigration?
You made a blanket statement that liberals (that means all liberals) want uncontrolled immigration from third world nations (meaning all third world nations) which is a stupid statement.
And if anyone started this, it would be Ronald Reagan. He must have been the most liberal after all.
You made a blanket statement that liberals (that means all liberals) want uncontrolled immigration from third world nations (meaning all third world nations) which is a stupid statement.
And if anyone started this, it would be Ronald Reagan. He must have been the most liberal after all.
PSST way before Regan there was this little place called Ellis Island.
Oh, gosh. I don't know. Maybe the same reason Reagan did. You didn't have a rebuttal to my comment by the way. A ready market for cheap labor is why we have 15 million Mexican, Central and South American illegal immigrants (and they're progeny). You know it, I know it, everyone knows it. Liberal sympathy once they're here didn't cause that.
I agree Reagan was misguided and he admitted later it was a bad decision but what is Obama's excuse when there is so much unemployment of Americans? Why do the liberals, Pelosi included, want all this cheap labor coming in?
There is a whole other reason more kids are getting pregnant in Texas. It's the big demographic shift going on in Texas, people coming over the border whose culture has it normal to start giving birth at age 13 or 14.
The causes have nothing to do with sex education being taught, it's a new culture moving in that promotes early sexuality and pregnancy. It's how it was done back home after all.
Conclusions Changing population characteristics in Texas and differences in sexual activity and contraceptive failure among racial/ethnic groups indicate that teenage pregnancy will not continue to decline in the coming decade. The adolescents most at risk for pregnancy are expected to increase significantly. Pregnancy prevention programs need to be intensified and adapted to the changing Texas social climate in order to preempt dramatic increases in teenage pregnancy.
War, disease and starvation will take care of the problem. To be honest, I am not seeing how this will be a problem for developed nations.
Very true, developed nation need not worry and emerging countries will change as with time, if they can find some freedom.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pamky
Contrary to popular belief, the fertility rates in developing countries are decreasing but because of the population momentum the total number of people is increasing. After this century total population will definitely decrease.
How can we really predict what will happen in 90 years? Prediction models fail us in almost every non rules based science.
How can we really predict what will happen in 90 years? Prediction models fail us in almost every non rules based science.
Every country had falling fertility with technological progress. Its not a prediction, its reality. Fertility is decreasing even in developing countries and its even decreasing at a faster pace than it was decreasing in the western world.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You didn't have a rebuttal to my comment by the way. A ready market for cheap labor is why we have 15 million Mexican, Central and South American illegal immigrants (and they're progeny). You know it, I know it, everyone knows it. Liberal sympathy once they're here didn't cause that.
