Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-01-2011, 12:40 PM
 
760 posts, read 685,704 times
Reputation: 457

Advertisements

I can't believe this hasn't been in place already...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-01-2011, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Hillsboro, OR
2,200 posts, read 4,423,197 times
Reputation: 1386
Gambling... I agree with that.

Alcohol... give them a monetary limit per month to spend on it ($15 probably works).

But, I also agree, if they can just get cash, then this is pointless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2011, 12:40 PM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,730,662 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
It's a very poor law if ATM cash is available. All this really does is put pressure on the retailers. I'm not sure why people cheer laws like this that do nothing to actually put pressure on the abusers.
Instead of an ATM card, these "wards of the state" should be given a sack of rice and bushel of potatoes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2011, 12:42 PM
 
1,770 posts, read 2,897,817 times
Reputation: 1174
Quote:
Originally Posted by psulions2007 View Post
Gambling... I agree with that.

Alcohol... give them a monetary limit per month to spend on it ($15 probably works).

But, I also agree, if they can just get cash, then this is pointless.
Disagree.
If you want the luxury of booze, you work and spend your money on it. Welfare is supposed to help people. Only people's needs to be met. Sadly over time, the "needs" sure have expanded greatly..

If you have the money to drink, smoke, get high, and gamble.. you have money for your needs and life.

We do need to cut the 'cash' part of this EBT thing. Why give them cash?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2011, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Allendale MI
2,523 posts, read 2,203,791 times
Reputation: 698
Waiting to hear who these welfare types are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2011, 12:47 PM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,730,662 times
Reputation: 6407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michigantown View Post
Waiting to hear who these welfare types are.

Anyone who lives in the "cash only" economy. They pay their utilitity bills with money orders or cash to avoid opening a bank account that can be tracked by the govt to forfeit their free or subsidized housing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2011, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Silver Springs, FL
23,416 posts, read 37,007,099 times
Reputation: 15560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michigantown View Post
Waiting to hear who these welfare types are.
You and me both....I already know exactly to whom the other poster was referring to when he was in St Louis at the casino, I would just like to hear how he knew they were on welfare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2011, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Silver Springs, FL
23,416 posts, read 37,007,099 times
Reputation: 15560
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
Anyone who lives in the "cash only" economy. They pay their utilitity bills with money orders or cash to avoid opening a bank account that can be tracked by the govt to forfeit their free or subsidized housing.
One can only suppose we should outlaw money orders.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2011, 12:52 PM
 
1,770 posts, read 2,897,817 times
Reputation: 1174
No, they just want to hear "minorities" or other words to describe "welfare" type. It's actually pretty laughable at the hypocrisy at this.

When minorities are called "welfare type", it's offensive.
Yet, as seen in the link below, when we talk about wealth.. it's OK that we can talk about the amount of minorities on welfare provided they come out as the victims.

//www.city-data.com/forum/polit...inorities.html

So it's OK to say minorities are on welfare, when it makes them look like victims?
But it's not ok to say they are on welfare, if it's used otherwise?

I actually really don't know the answer to this question. The double standard in America strikes again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-01-2011, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Pacific Northwest
1,739 posts, read 1,916,927 times
Reputation: 3449
Quote:
Originally Posted by JordanJP View Post
Good, now make it illegal to use the money for Xboxes, Iphones, and super-expensive clothing and accessories and we'll be golden.
And don't forget the hair extensions, expensive manicures and expensive make-up as well. My mother sees this every single day as a cashier at Squal*Mart.

And no, she isn't imagining it either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top