Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-03-2011, 03:22 PM
 
4,410 posts, read 6,138,513 times
Reputation: 2908

Advertisements

They should have put a surface of plastic squares over the whole site, the kind that light up as you walk over them. But you wouldn't see them from the street. Instead, on the fringe of the site would stand groves of trees and small areas of grasses with pathways leading inwards leading the visitor inward. The foliage would eventually give way to the surface of plastic squares. On the squares would be the names of the victims, imprints of newspaper headlines, audio of the important speeches, as well as expressions of love and remembrance from the survivors. And as one approached the clearly defined center of the site, the lights underneath the squares would get brighter and brighter. When people stand at the true center, a hologram would be clearly visible, one showing a view of what once stood there one glorious morning in September: the site in its prime, untouched by violence and populated with people going about their day as they always had before.

No, no stupid cross. No religious intrusion. No tower of greed or expression of power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-03-2011, 03:23 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by hilgi View Post
The cross is a symbol of salvation, not remembrance.
Did you read the article? Read it and then worry about what you say. 72% of the people who were polled manaed to want the cross. Maybe those rotten people asked those polled if they were atheists and then left them out. Most pros here would say that happened.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2011, 03:25 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhouse2001 View Post
They should have put a surface of plastic squares over the whole site, the kind that light up as you walk over them. But you wouldn't see them from the street. Instead, on the fringe of the site would stand groves of trees and small areas of grasses with pathways leading inwards beckoning the visitor to what lies beyond. The foliage would eventually give way to the surface of plastic squares. On the squares would be the names of the victims, imprints of newspaper headlines, audio of the important speeches, as well as expressions of love and remembrance from the survivors. And as one approaches the clearly defined center of the site, the lights underneath the squares get brighter and brighter. When one person stands at the true center, a hologram would be clearly visible to the visitor giving the them a view of what stood there on one glorious morning in September: the site in its prime, untouched by violence and populated with people going about their day as they always had before.

No, no stupid cross. No religious intrusion. No tower of greed or expression of power.
As a part of the 28% of the minority do you think that your thoughts should be used as the basis of the decision?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2011, 03:32 PM
 
5,391 posts, read 7,230,341 times
Reputation: 2857
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
It would not have been a target if it were a mosque.
Al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists have bombed many mosques in Iraq.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2011, 03:32 PM
 
4,410 posts, read 6,138,513 times
Reputation: 2908
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
As a part of the 28% of the minority do you think that your thoughts should be used as the basis of the decision?
Of course, I always want my opinion to be heard. If pressed, I think most people polled would probably pull back a bit on their desire to have a cross erected because they know how much it would appear to be unAmerican. A minority would demand that we are Christian nation so why should we be concerned how it looks, but they would be overruled rather quickly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2011, 03:34 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,691 posts, read 18,454,215 times
Reputation: 9596
Rasmussen took a poll.

That poll isn't going to be used for anything except discussion.

Ultimately it's up to the Port Authority of NY & NJ if they erect the 9/11 cross at the Memorial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2011, 03:36 PM
 
4,049 posts, read 5,032,096 times
Reputation: 1333
Quote:
Originally Posted by hilgi View Post
The cross is a symbol of salvation, not remembrance.
Er it's a symbol of brutal death really.. and guilt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2011, 03:38 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,833,234 times
Reputation: 6438
Quote:
Originally Posted by LogicIsYourFriend View Post
Er it's a symbol of brutal death really.. and guilt
Crown of thorns, anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2011, 03:41 PM
 
1,770 posts, read 2,897,517 times
Reputation: 1174
How about a, :gasp: just one big American Flag?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-03-2011, 03:51 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
14,361 posts, read 9,788,539 times
Reputation: 6663
Quote:
Originally Posted by robbobobbo View Post
Al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists have bombed many mosques in Iraq.
But in the US they erect them as a symbol of triumph. Muslims have a history of building Mosques, not to profess religion, but as symbols of conquering their enemies.

What and where they bomb has nothing to do with anything in reality. Simply because they bomb mosques (anywhere) doesn't balance the attack on 9-11.

I'd like to see 5000 terrorists strap bombs on themselves, meet on a field in the wilderness and find out who's vest works best.

Last edited by steven_h; 08-03-2011 at 04:02 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top