Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:14 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 63,897,873 times
Reputation: 9383

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
That will come as news to Boeing, United Technologies, 100,000 scientist and researchers involved in basic research, Dell computers, and host of other companies that supply the federal government with expertise, supplies and equipment.
Wow, I thought the stimulus was full of tax cuts, and welfare support for things like food stamps, and here we are, you telling me it went towards 100,000 high paying, high tech jobs. Boy am I glad you were here ovcatto to set us straight on where it went and we dont have to rely upon the Congressional bill for facts
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:16 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 63,897,873 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Even the CBO admits the figures are purely hypothetical and made up, using pre-determined standards which would have made it IMPOSSIBLE for a negative number to come as a result. That sounds dishonest to me, and find it even funnier that liberals buy being lied to over and over again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:17 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 63,897,873 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by andrea3821 View Post
seriously??
These are the very same people who will tell you that Obama holds no blame for the deficits..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:19 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 63,897,873 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Such sophistry.

This idiot blogger thinks those stimulus jobs were permanent, and three million people are current employed with stimulus money??
I often wonder how many people posting here, are also bloggers, and they post to their own stories to show "facts".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:20 AM
 
Location: USA
2,593 posts, read 4,224,692 times
Reputation: 2240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
The US economy grew by 1.2%, even Cuba's economy grew by 1.5%.
Wow, pretty sad if that's true!

They have an almost 100% public sector workforce and are laying off bigtime.

Cuba to lay off 500,000 state workers by mid-2011 - On Deadline - USATODAY.com

500K workers doesn't sound like much here in the US, but Cuba only has 12,000,000 residents. That would be like the US losing 12,500,000 additional jobs!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:21 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,829 posts, read 21,917,471 times
Reputation: 13690
Quote:
Originally Posted by brentwoodgirl View Post
Obama set the measure of success for the stimulus. Success= UE below 8%.

So by his own measurement, it was a miserable failure. UE remains over 9%.

Almost $1 Trillion thrown away on bad decisions.

And he laughs it up over those jobs "not being as shovel ready as we thought." Ha Ha, a real knee slapper. That furstrates me to no end- the casual hilariouness he finds in adding $800+ BILLION to the national debt and our children's future on a huge failure.
Wrong, without passing his stimulus we would be at 8%, the stimulus was supposed to lower UE down to around 6%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:24 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,829 posts, read 21,917,471 times
Reputation: 13690
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoomzoom3 View Post
Wow, pretty sad if that's true!

They have an almost 100% public sector workforce and are laying off bigtime.

Cuba to lay off 500,000 state workers by mid-2011 - On Deadline - USATODAY.com

500K workers doesn't sound like much here in the US, but Cuba only has 12,000,000 residents. That would be like the US losing 12,500,000 additional jobs!
I was off by 0.1%, we grew at an amazing 0bama induced rate of 1.3%

Growth anemic, debt row poses recession risk | Reuters

Output increased at a 1.3 percent annual pace in the second quarter as consumer spending barely rose, the Commerce Department said on Friday. In the first three months of the year, the economy advanced just 0.4 percent, a sharp downward revision from the previously reported 1.9 percent gain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:29 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
20,054 posts, read 18,229,050 times
Reputation: 3826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
The US economy grew by 1.2%, even Cuba's economy grew by 1.5%.
Libs will tell you that we just need to be more like Cuba.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:36 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,829 posts, read 21,917,471 times
Reputation: 13690
Quote:
Originally Posted by summers73 View Post
Libs will tell you that we just need to be more like Cuba.
no they wouldn't, he is cutting government and growing the private sector in it's place. LOL

Cuba (GDP 1.5%) Enacts Economic Reforms | Sweetness & Light
The measures the assembly was discussing in its twice-yearly session include cutting more than one million state jobs in a move to reduce Cuba’s vast bureaucracy and reducing the state’s role in areas such as agriculture, retail and construction.

Small private businesses will be encouraged to step in to fill the space, while state subsidies for goods and service will be phased out.

The BBC’s Michael Voss in Havana says one of the biggest obstacles Mr Castro now faces is resistance from party bureaucrats who face losing their job under the changes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-04-2011, 10:39 AM
2K5Gx2km
 
n/a posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Even the CBO admits the figures are purely hypothetical and made up, using pre-determined standards which would have made it IMPOSSIBLE for a negative number to come as a result. That sounds dishonest to me, and find it even funnier that liberals buy being lied to over and over again.
Political Statistitions = BS Artists
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top