Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And you know this how? Also, are you suggesting we have increased by such? Can you validate this with any evidence?
By all means, make your case.
Monitoring reef sea surface temperature
The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) monitors for bleaching "hot spots", areas where sea surface temperature rises 1 °C (34 °F) or more above the long-term monthly average. This system detected the worldwide 1998 bleaching event,[14][15] that corresponded to an El Niño. NOAA also uses a satellite with 50k resolution at night, which covers a large area and does not detect the maximum sea surface temperatures occurring usually around noon.[citation needed]
Source Deals with coral bleaching from minor temp increases
If anything, the medical research industry is confronted with the same problems as they can not account for most of the variables to which the human process involves. If you are attempting to link the two with any certainty, you have already made the mistake of making too many assumptions to achieve the conclusion you desire.
I just brought it up from a credibility standpoint. If this company pushed Phillip Morris's agenda before, morals be damned; I'm not sure I'd trust too much research they do on climate change, given their past ability to overlook facts to push their paid agenda forward. Do you happen to know if it's the same research firm?
This is a big one as many of the errors found in research as such have been major deviations of standard statistical practice (that is saying it nicely as some are outright stupid like in their application).
MANY scientific articles have very poor statistical evaluations. This is particulary true in medical research. That is why ANYONE who publishes in the literature should have taken at least one graduate level statistics class and submit thier date for a statistical consult and evaluation both BEFORE and AFTER the collection of data.
Garbage in- Garbage out. That is what global warming is all about to the inane who have no knowledge of science or statistics. That being said, regardless of the facts and actual science, they JUST KNOW it to be true, regardless of the facts. This is why this is a cult, and not a real scientific theory.
It appears it has taken a while but the truth crept its way to the top. This according to Rasmussen. It might be time to lay low for the globals and make a complete reversal back to their doomsday predictions of the seventies that an ice age is coming.
Naw, let's all stick with global warmage. It's starting to get fun.
Ok, dude... seriously? Let's take a crash course on critical reasoning, shall we?
Let me illustrate this for you in another way. Back in the middle ages, probably 95% of people would have polled that the Earth is flat. Guess what: that didn't mean they were right.
.
As I recall reading about it, ALL of the smartest scientists in the world told the other people that the world was flat.
How did you know they only polled people who don't understand the laws of gravity?
Maybe they polled all those scientists who told us the world was flat.... for centuries.
I was being a bit sarcastic. Most people don't understand science and the scientific method.
Those scientists you refer to are dead. It may come as some surprise to you, but the idea that the world is flat has been disproven. Though if the debate were happening today, the RWs on CD would argue that it's flat.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.