Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-25-2011, 11:44 PM
 
1,337 posts, read 1,516,036 times
Reputation: 656

Advertisements

Michigan Bar Owners Bounce Lawmakers To Protest Smoking Ban

Some days, politicians could use a drink. But lawmakers in Michigan may soon find it harder to get one.

Hundreds of bar owners in the Great Lakes State plan to deprive lawmakers of their hospitality by banning them from their establishments in protest of the state's smoking ban.

A new group, Protect Private Property Rights in Michigan, claims it has more than 500 bar owners statewide pledging to blacklist almost every lawmaker. The idea is to persuade the Legislature to at least revisit the ban, which went into effect last year.

"We're going to have to remind Lansing that our bars are in fact private property, so therefore they are now persona non grata as of Sept. 1," said Stephen Mace, director of the group and a bar worker himself.

[snip]

However, the Michigan Licensed Beverage Association was not thrilled with Mace's latest idea. While the group opposes the smoking ban, spokesman Peter Broderick said there are better ways to voice the industry's frustration than by banning lawmakers. "It could only hurt you to alienate your legislators," Broderick said


----------------

[snip] Click link to read rest of article
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-26-2011, 12:11 AM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,912,910 times
Reputation: 2618
*chuckle*

I love it.

Too many people have this misconception that a private establishment is a public right. You see these idiots all over the place go on about how they have a right to go to an establishment as they desire without ever considering the authority of the one who owns it.

I would love to see this become more common as they start banning people left and right for their controlling idiocy.

"What's that? You don't want people smoking here? Ok, fine, but you aren't allowed to come here either, so bugger off!"

Reminds me of some loud mouth in my home town who was going on about how he supported the smoking ban in one of the local bars. The owner heard him and kicked his arse out telling him if he ever entered again, he would be arrested for trespassing. It was comical to say the least.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top