Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You mean a policy of violating the territory of another sovereign nation?
Suddenly this matters to you, just because it is Obama doing it? You really are going to try to equate these kinds of surgical strikes as violation of sovereignty compared to the wholesale invasion and occupation of a country?
Quote:
How many innocent civilians has this policy killed in Pakistan I wonder...I am sure you do not care.
Not even a mere fraction of those killed in Iraq in a years-long war that was never necessary.
Bush tried to kill flies with a sledgehammer. Obama has the sense to use a flyswatter, and he's doing it a lot more cheaper and effectively than Bush.
Suddenly this matters to you, just because it is Obama doing it? You really are going to try to equate these kinds of surgical strikes as violation of sovereignty compared to the wholesale invasion and occupation of a country?
LOL...I LOVE when Obamalamdingdongs try and justify their love for attacking other nations...
Quote:
Not even a mere fraction of those killed in Iraq in a years-long war that was never necessary.
And was continued by your man in the WH.
Quote:
Bush tried to kill flies with a sledgehammer. Obama has the sense to use a flyswatter, and he's doing it a lot more cheaper and effectively than Bush.
LOL....please PLEASE one of you use the term 'collateral damage',it would SO make this farce complete.
LOL...I LOVE when Obamalamdingdongs try and justify their love for attacking other nations...
Gee, where did that happen in this thread?
Please do outline your argument as to why we SHOULDN'T be trying to kill these people wherever we find them, since that seems to be your attitude.
Quote:
And was continued by your man in the WH.
They were already there when he was elected. This isn't much of a point you are making here. Not to mention that he's winding it down.
Quote:
LOL....please PLEASE one of you use the term 'collateral damage',it would SO make this farce complete.
Let me explain how mind-numbingly simple it is:
Predator drone strikes can only kill a limited number of people, usually those in or around a vehicle or a single discrete building.
Contrast that with the invasion and long-term occupation of a whole nation, complete with sustained aerial bombing, etc., etc., all to address a concern that was never really a concern.
You have no argument here, you just don't want to give Obama credit for anything.
Quote:
I love warmonger(chickenhawks too) leftards.
I love pissy hypocritical right wing hawks that would be doing nothing but cheering on the President for a job well done if he were a Republican.
Are you asserting if terrorists were found hiding in....ohh...lets say Mexico,the USA would be justified in using drones to kill them?
Hmmm....can't wait to read your response.
And after you DO reply,I will go down the list of nations in the world,see where you draw the line.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
