Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-05-2012, 05:53 PM
 
24,404 posts, read 23,061,247 times
Reputation: 15013

Advertisements

Reporting the news costs money. You need to hire staff, go on site, pay expenses. There's research, production costs, equipment. MSNBC has two high school interns working for free and a street food cart vendor chsing down leads for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2012, 06:32 AM
 
20,329 posts, read 19,921,823 times
Reputation: 13440
Quote:
Originally Posted by meson View Post
Unlike the anti-democrat media, IE: FOX News, they are waiting for the results of the investigation....
With that overreaching explantion I hope your not standing on a ladder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 06:46 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,121,445 times
Reputation: 9409
We don't have cable TV since we rarely watch TV, but when I do watch I stream MSNBC live on my computer. The streaming website also has a chatroom attached to it. Fairly decent concept, as everyone in the room is also watching the news commentary and can comment on what's being discussed.

What I have been able to learn from chatting with a bunch of hardcore liberals is this: NONE of them are interested in the reality on the ground. I take items of debate/fact from CD P&OC forum and present them to the Liberals in that chat room, and 9 times out of 10 they simply will not accept the facts on the ground as they are, particularly if it involves tearing down the Barack Obama Administration.

I have found myself VERY frustrated at times, because these people do not want to hear the truth at all. From this experience, I can see why MSNBC appeals to Liberals, because the Lion's Share of liberals have ZERO interest in anything other than protecting this President at all costs.....facts be damned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,947,200 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Backspace View Post
And virtually no ratings.
Actually, they beat CNN. http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/201...0-2011/115069/

The Rachel Maddow Show beats Piers Morgan Tonight; The Ed Show beats Anderson Cooper 360 and Hardball WITH C. MATTHEWS beats ERIN BURNETT OUTFRONT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 07:43 AM
 
10,793 posts, read 13,544,828 times
Reputation: 6189
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanrene View Post
Not one segment about the obama/Solyndra debacle. The scandal is ALL OVER the networks, in the print media, on cable...EXCEPT for the ed, madcow, larry and tingle's shows.

Not one word from this bunch of radical leftists, who are clearly interested in protecting obama as much as they can.

MSNBC Prime Time Programs Still Haven't Reported Obama's Solyndra Scandal | NewsBusters.org



Amazing, isn't it?

No wonder they have virtually ZERO credibility.

Are you really surprised??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:23 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,947,200 times
Reputation: 5661
The Solyndra 'debacle' wasn't much of a debacle. The government lent them money and the company went belly up. This happens all the time in the private sector. While the righties want to believe that this is a stunning indictment of the Obama Administration, there is no hard evidence of wrong-doing.

Moreover, the scale of this is nothing like the billions of missing cash the Bush Admin couldn't account for and went missing in Iraq.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:29 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,121,445 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
The Solyndra 'debacle' wasn't much of a debacle. The government lent them money and the company went belly up. This happens all the time in the private sector. While the righties want to believe that this is a stunning indictment of the Obama Administration, there is no hard evidence of wrong-doing.

Moreover, the scale of this is nothing like the billions of missing cash the Bush Admin couldn't account for and went missing in Iraq.
Are you seriously comparing a taxpayer funded debacle/failure to that of the risk/reward variability that takes place in the private sector?

My goodness. You really aren't concerned about your taxdollars at all are you? Democrats absolutely LOVE people like you MTA! You should be furious instead of protecting this Administration!

Geez, man, get a handle on yourself! This nation is sinking fast....we don't need apologists explaining away waste!

PS...Billions in cash missing? If you're referring to the planeload of money that was missing.....that was Iraqi money. Not taxpayer dollars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:48 AM
 
59,029 posts, read 27,298,344 times
Reputation: 14274
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
The Solyndra 'debacle' wasn't much of a debacle. The government lent them money and the company went belly up. This happens all the time in the private sector. While the righties want to believe that this is a stunning indictment of the Obama Administration, there is no hard evidence of wrong-doing.

Moreover, the scale of this is nothing like the billions of missing cash the Bush Admin couldn't account for and went missing in Iraq.
As usual you show your lack of knowledge on a subject while commenting on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,947,200 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Are you seriously comparing a taxpayer funded debacle/failure to that of the risk/reward variability that takes place in the private sector?

My goodness. You really aren't concerned about your taxdollars at all are you? Democrats absolutely LOVE people like you MTA! You should be furious instead of protecting this Administration!

Geez, man, get a handle on yourself! This nation is sinking fast....we don't need apologists explaining away waste!

PS...Billions in cash missing? If you're referring to the planeload of money that was missing.....that was Iraqi money. Not taxpayer dollars.
No, that was U.S. taxpayer cash -- $12 billion worth:
Quote:
WASHINGTON — A House committee report has questioned whether some of the billions of dollars in cash shipped to Iraq after the American invasion — mostly in huge, shrink-wrapped stacks of $100 bills — might have ended up with the insurgent groups now battling American troops.

The report was made public Tuesday by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee at a hearing when Democrats sharply questioned the former American civilian administrator in Iraq, L. Paul Bremer, about lax management of the nearly $12 billion in cash shipped to Iraq between May 2003 and June 2004.

Bremer defended his performance as head of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, noting that the United States had to bring tons of dollars into Iraq because the country had no functioning banking system.

"We had to pay Iraqis in cash," Bremer said of the money, most of which came from Iraqi oil sales. "Delay would have been demoralizing and unfair to millions of Iraqi families."

Source
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 09:03 AM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,121,445 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
No, that was U.S. taxpayer cash -- $12 billion worth:
Your source does not say that $12B was lost. Your source calls into question the management of that cash. That's a tad bit different than saying $12B was lost and/or unaccounted for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top