Republican Rep Accidentally Admits The GOP Has No Interest In Creating Jobs (government, claim)

[Darkatt]

Originally Posted by Quick Enough

You should read the previous posts so you won't make a fool of yourself.
Try #20

Then again, I like watching lefties make fools of themselves.

Actually I compare it to shooting fish in a barrel.

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by MrClose

It's all yours with only a 'minor' problem attached .. The Parrot Heads (libs/lefties) will pretend not to have seen it!

Duly noted.

Thank you

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by florida.bob

We are still under the Bush tax plan that is heavily benefiting the upper income people which is still not helping. The only thing that has helped with jobs has been the Obama Stimulus. A new tax plan option to be presented Monday. May help.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/18/us...ires.html?_r=1

You hate FOXNEWS, but, expect us to believe the NYTimes?

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by florida.bob

Yes he did allow the ransom to be paid.

WOW, ransom.....so obama is now a terrorist?

[MORebelWoman]

Originally Posted by sickofnyc

Republican Rep Accidentally Admits The GOP Has No Interest In Creating Jobs

Shocking I tell you...Shocking!

BS and nothing else! You need to start being truthful about the actual quote and stop taking things out of context. You libs are really sad.

[MORebelWoman]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

WOW, ransom.....so obama is now a terrorist?

He was from the first day he came onto the political scene.

[sickofnyc]

Originally Posted by MORebelWoman

BS and nothing else! You need to start being truthful about the actual quote and stop taking things out of context. You libs are really sad.

Which alternate universe are you living in? I titled the thread the actual title of the article. Also, where did I misquote anyone?

[sickofnyc]

Originally Posted by Quick Enough

Don't let him off the hook that easy.

How about the 2010 elections AFTER the dems controlled ALL 3 branches?

Wasn't that the biggest turn of of power countrywide in history?

You're kidding...right?

Democrats Step Up Moves to Limit Senate Filibusters

When Democrats awoke the day after the 2008 election to overwhelming majorities in the House and Senate, plus control of the White House, many imagined they would be able to accomplish nearly anything they wanted. It seemed possible that Congress would finish health care reform within a year, including a strong "public option" plan. A climate bill would sail through, along with immigration reform, the pro-union Employee Free Choice Act and an end to the ban on non-closeted gays in the military.

What happened to those Democratic hopes? They have been shattered by the Republicans' unprecedented reliance on the filibuster, a legislative maneuver that can slam the brakes on even popular legislation.

Filibuster Reform: Dems Push for Rules Change in Senate - TIME

[wrench409]

Originally Posted by florida.bob

We are still under the Bush tax plan that is heavily benefiting the upper income people which is still not helping. The only thing that has helped with jobs has been the Obama Stimulus. A new tax plan option to be presented Monday. May help.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/18/us...ires.html?_r=1

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

GOOD ONE!

uh..........sorry I thought I was reading the 'Funny Links' Forum - the one with nothing in it!

[pghquest]

Originally Posted by PITTSTON2SARASOTA

The BOTTOM 40% OWN 0.2% of ALL the wealth in our nation.

Thats because a vast number of americans rely upon the government for income. Welfare, social security, disability etc. How do you expect people to accumulate wealth while they receive poverty income?