Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I bet they weren't so teary-eyed when the white-supremacist guy fried for dragging a man to death.
Teary eyed for an act of blatant torture and hate of an innocent victim? The guy thay "fried' was no doubt the guy that comitted the heinous act and got what he deserved.
In the Davis case, there is a very big body of doubt due to someone admitting to other individuals that he is the real murderer and seven of nine wtinesses coming forward to recant their original testimonies. You don't see the difference between these two cases??????
Teary eyed for an act of blatant torture and hate of an innocent victim? The guy thay "fried' was no doubt the guy that comitted the heinous act and got what he deserved.
In the Davis case, there is a very big body of doubt due to someone admitting to other individuals that he is the real murderer and seven of nine wtinesses coming forward to recant their original testimonies. You don't see the difference between these two cases??????
No, because you have not accurately portrayed the trial history. Why do you leave out key details, such as the Supreme Court agreeing to review this case in 2007 and determining that nothing has changed and no facts were skewed? This is the SECOND time the SC has shot down the appeal, but yet you ignore this fact. Why do you ignore these tidbits?
Teary eyed for an act of blatant torture and hate of an innocent victim? The guy thay "fried' was no doubt the guy that comitted the heinous act and got what he deserved.
In the Davis case, there is a very big body of doubt due to someone admitting to other individuals that he is the real murderer and seven of nine wtinesses coming forward to recant their original testimonies. You don't see the difference between these two cases??????
It doesn't matter what I see. A jury, and judge after judge right up to the SCOTUS saw no reason to commute his sentence. I am sure they had all the facts, not just the propaganda from the anti-death penalty crowd.
Teary eyed for an act of blatant torture and hate of an innocent victim? The guy thay "fried' was no doubt the guy that comitted the heinous act and got what he deserved.
In the Davis case, there is a very big body of doubt due to someone admitting to other individuals that he is the real murderer and seven of nine wtinesses coming forward to recant their original testimonies. You don't see the difference between these two cases??????
The state had 34 witnessess against Davis, not nine. Why does the left keep perpetuating these lies?
How many people did Davis murder during his lifetime? The death penealty was only for the last two. There was never any doubt of his guilt.
Murder is a hate crime regardless of the color of the victim.
No, because you have not accurately portrayed the trial history. Why do you leave out key details, such as the Supreme Court agreeing to review this case in 2007 and determining that nothing has changed and no facts were skewed? This is the SECOND time the SC has shot down the appeal, but yet you ignore this fact. Why do you ignore these tidbits?
The lefties only do what the msm tell them.
I had a hard time finding the truth of the matter.
Many, many pages of "Save Troy Davis".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
