Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I just read a report where the EPA will cost 183 thousand jobs per year with their new regs. So much for his job's plan.........errrr.........campaign tour paid for by taxpayers.
If I spend $200,000 for 5 construction workers to build a 3 bedroom house does that mean that each worker pockets $40,000 or does it mean that some fraction of that $200,000 pay for labor and the remainder for materials? And at the end of the day, do I not have a new house??
You and others like yourself like to take the total amount spent, divide it by the number of jobs and then proclaim that this represents the the price per job created always leaving out of the equation the cost of materials or for that matter the jobs that those material represent.
How much have the Bush/Obama tax cuts cost? Where are the jobs?
The jobs are in India. Ford's opening a plant there.
If you hurry, you might get hired. There's a flight from New York to Mumbai (that would be Bombay for the 'tards) for just $539. You don't like winter anyway, so here's your big chance to get away from it all.
Maybe you can print that up on a flyer and hand it out to the home-haters standing on the street corners and intersections. I'm sure they can con people out of $539 in less than a week for the plane ticket. And what a bargain, since they're home-haters they probably don't got no luggage.
If I spend $200,000 for 5 construction workers to build a 3 bedroom house does that mean that each worker pockets $40,000 or does it mean that some fraction of that $200,000 pay for labor and the remainder for materials? And at the end of the day, do I not have a new house??
You and others like yourself like to take the total amount spent, divide it by the number of jobs and then proclaim that this represents the the price per job created always leaving out of the equation the cost of materials or for that matter the jobs that those material represent.
If I spend $200,000 for 5 construction workers to build a 3 bedroom house does that mean that each worker pockets $40,000 or does it mean that some fraction of that $200,000 pay for labor and the remainder for materials? And at the end of the day, do I not have a new house??
You and others like yourself like to take the total amount spent, divide it by the number of jobs and then proclaim that this represents the the price per job created always leaving out of the equation the cost of materials or for that matter the jobs that those material represent.
No wonder we have declining SAT scores.
LOL @ trying to correlate a decline in a standardized vanilla test that doesn't measure intelligence with an understanding of basic economics.
Nice use of taxpayer money clown Obozo and tax-cheat Timmy!
Too bad you don't read beyond the headline.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
