Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2011, 08:50 AM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,489,598 times
Reputation: 16962

Advertisements

There were many places along the way where I could have acted differently, if I had known better.

My original thought was to hold that property for a few more decades, as a side income for my retirement. It never occurred to me to sell it when the economy was doing good. Again a crystal ball would have been a great asset.[/quote]


I'm back again with an admonishment that is mean't with the best of intentions.

You made many mistakes along the way a more prudent "investor" would not have made. The "crystal ball" reference keeps 'pinging' me as there is absolutely no successful investor in history who had the advantage of a "crystal ball" in the most absolute of terms. They all took risks but mitigated those risks with due diligence when entering the envestment. It really is that simple.

I'm fully sympathetic with your admission on this issue and completely understand how this stuff happens in today's world but here's the bottom line.

You were making nothing more than an investment and as such it's a business deal that requires your full attention to mitigate any potential loss. Your first and biggest mistake was to go in "over-exposed". You could not afford to carry the mortgage payment if your occupancy rate fell markedly as it could for any variety of reasons. During a peak in economic cycle you would have been fairly safe to overlook certain negative indicators but in the 19 years you kept the property there may have been at least two negative downturns that you chose to ignore.

In those same 19 years, there may have been more than one opportunity for you to sell off one of your holdings to pay off some of the principal debt load of this "favoured" holding. I used the word coast in a previous post to indicate my feelings about your chosen method of observing your investment closely. You had exposed your future retirement income to a significant risk factor and chose to coast!

You waited far too long to become pro-active and instead were only reactive in your handling of this whole thing. You have stated many times that you were in arrears before this whole fiasco with bank sub-contractors got out of hand. That is far far too late for you to exercise attempts at control, surely the signs were there, perhaps even a couple of years ahead of that point, for you to start the legal process to unload this money pit.

As any investment, this was a gamble, you chose to keep ante'ing up and doubling down instead of folding, until your entire pot was on the table.

This thread needs to be read by anyone comtemplating a real estate purchase as an investment. It is a textbook case of going in over-exposed and staying in through a few opportunities to realize an equity gain on that risky investment potential until it's too late and the market has collapsed.

A lesson here for many to take to heart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-04-2011, 08:56 AM
 
Location: North Cackelacky....in the hills.
19,567 posts, read 21,870,208 times
Reputation: 2519
The 'mistake' I see was in using your savings to 'do the right thing' and keep paying...of course we have been brainwashed to think this way,the banksters have no such issues.

We did it ourselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2011, 11:08 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,559 posts, read 17,227,205 times
Reputation: 17597
Default legislative watchdog committee 2005

Still in power Barney and friends were the government assigned watchdogs protecting us from financial collapse...

Is it a wonder with Barney and friends still in power that the US is facing economic problems. Better yet ask the folks who continuously vote Barney Frank to consecutive terms.


Barney Frank, 2005: What Housing Bubble? - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:31 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top