Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-04-2011, 01:50 PM
 
78,409 posts, read 60,593,823 times
Reputation: 49691

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LML View Post
Every time this subject arises I find myself wondering just why it is that some white folks are so angry that they can't use this word? Why are they so jealous of the freedom of blacks to use a particular word that is not acceptable for their use? Just what is it that you think you are missing out on? I find it extremely hard to believe that anyone growing up in the U.S. would not know the history of this word and its usage and be able to understand why, coming from a white person, it would hold an entire different feeling and meaning than it would coming from a black person. So just why is it you are so anxious to be able to use it? Could it be because you DO understand it?
It's not that people want to use the word it's just incredibly hypocritical in how the word usage is policed.

In this specific example, a commentator solely due to their skin color is called out for quoting or repeating a political situation.

In other examples, people have gotten in trouble for even using words that SOUND similar (illiteracy for the loss) such as *****rdly which will most certainly be censored here.

Me personally, I understand the situation and frankly I'd just steer clear of it out of sensitivity.

What bothers me though is that this sort of "get out of jail free card" mentality for minority groups is damaging to intra-minority relations. When you feel that you don't have to watch calling people various ethnic slurs because you are a "protected class" that's where I find fault.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-04-2011, 02:00 PM
 
3,335 posts, read 2,659,924 times
Reputation: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
It's not that people want to use the word it's just incredibly hypocritical in how the word usage is policed.

In this specific example, a commentator solely due to their skin color is called out for quoting or repeating a political situation.

In other examples, people have gotten in trouble for even using words that SOUND similar (illiteracy for the loss) such as *****rdly which will most certainly be censored here.

Me personally, I understand the situation and frankly I'd just steer clear of it out of sensitivity.

What bothers me though is that this sort of "get out of jail free card" mentality for minority groups is damaging to intra-minority relations. When you feel that you don't have to watch calling people various ethnic slurs because you are a "protected class" that's where I find fault.

Well put, Mathguy!

You NAILED IT. - You've articulated the 'fine point' of the hypocrasy of the 'priviledged character' aspect of this ''pushed on us'' ridiculous DOUBLE STANDARD! - Truly, it's Evil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2011, 02:01 PM
 
1,759 posts, read 2,029,352 times
Reputation: 950
Quote:
Originally Posted by LML
Every time this subject arises I find myself wondering just why it is that some white folks are so angry that they can't use this word?
We have freedom of speech and can use any words we like.
Now if you mean some of us can't use certain words without being told we're being insensitive or the like, that's different.

The day you tell me there's a word I can't say is the day I'll check my passport with a quizzical look upon my face,
just to make sure it says "United States of America" and not "North Korea" or "Afghanistan" or "Iraq."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2011, 02:06 PM
 
Location: La lune et les étoiles
18,258 posts, read 22,532,193 times
Reputation: 19593
Not to shock some of you but I did not see the problem with Barbara Walters saying "N-%%-rhead" in the context of the Rick Perry discussion. It wasn't being said to be flippant or insulting. Sherri Sheppard is a complete dult and this "controversy" only highlights the fact that she has very little to add in terms of intelligent discussion on any topic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2011, 02:18 PM
 
3,335 posts, read 2,659,924 times
Reputation: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by calipoppy View Post
Not to shock some of you but I did not see the problem with Barbara Walters saying "N-%%-rhead" in the context of the Rick Perry discussion. It wasn't being said to be flippant or insulting. Sherri Sheppard is a complete dult and this "controversy" only highlights the fact that she has very little to add in terms of intelligent discussion on any topic.
Luving most ALL these intelligent comments...like this one!

I sooooooooo Agree!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2011, 06:20 PM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,953,334 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
It's not that people want to use the word it's just incredibly hypocritical in how the word usage is policed.

In this specific example, a commentator solely due to their skin color is called out for quoting or repeating a political situation.

In other examples, people have gotten in trouble for even using words that SOUND similar (illiteracy for the loss) such as *****rdly which will most certainly be censored here.

Me personally, I understand the situation and frankly I'd just steer clear of it out of sensitivity.

What bothers me though is that this sort of "get out of jail free card" mentality for minority groups is damaging to intra-minority relations. When you feel that you don't have to watch calling people various ethnic slurs because you are a "protected class" that's where I find fault.
Agree.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-04-2011, 07:19 PM
 
3,335 posts, read 2,659,924 times
Reputation: 565
Originally Posted by LML
Every time this subject arises I find myself wondering just why it is that some white folks are so angry that they can't use this word?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alltheusernamesaretaken View Post
We have freedom of speech and can use any words we like.
Now if you mean some of us can't use certain words without being told we're being insensitive or the like, that's different.

The day you tell me there's a word I can't say is the day I'll check my passport with a quizzical look upon my face,
just to make sure it says "United States of America" and not "North Korea" or "Afghanistan" or "Iraq."
If what you stated is NOT truly a fact, then we are in 'Enemy' territory...and tyranny!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:14 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top