Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Since most of the people who make up the Occupy Wall Street protests have been spoiled white hipsters then they must be as crazy/racist as those eeeevil Tea Partiers, right? Because movements that are majority white are dangerous, maybe even Klans, and are not be taken seriously because they don't represent "everybody". Even HuffPo thinks so and they're as lily-livered liberal as you can get.
Why Is Occupy Wall Street A White People’s Protest? (http://www.renwl.org/why-is-occupy-wall-street-a-white-peoples-protest/15207/ - broken link)
This may sound bad, but this is just speculation. But I feel that if most of the occupiers were black, they wouldn't be taken as seriously. Because it is mostly white people, it seems more "serious" because it's affecting "more" people because white is the majority.
So then can you explain why the Tea Party is called racist for being mostly white?
The tea party isn't called racist for being mostly white, they were called racist for having racist signs at their protests and some of the members displaying racist sentiments.
This may sound bad, but this is just speculation. But I feel that if most of the occupiers were black, they wouldn't be taken as seriously. Because it is mostly white people, it seems more "serious" because it's affecting "more" people because white is the majority.
Interesting thought. I can agree that if the protest was majority black it would be laughed off even more than it is now.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.