Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Who do like? I'd like to see where your favored candidate rates on the nut-o-meter.
Well all of the other candidates that I have heard from....on either side, seem to pro interventionalist. To me supporting a huge military and military conquests on foreign soil does nothing but hurt our debt and kill our economy. So I believe the remaining candidates are nuts for continueing a policy that is against the interest of the U.S.
Who do like? I'd like to see where your favored candidate rates on the nut-o-meter.
I like Cain, I think Romney is the most electable. Things are serious enough in this country that we can't make perfect enemy of the good. There will be people who will knock any of the mainstream Republican candidates because they don't pass some rigid purity test. Good luck with 4 more years of Obama, if you do that. You will have no one to blame but yourself.
Regardless of our exchange, I am happy the Paul candidacy is going nowhere. He is nuts!
I will tell you what. Since you feel that way, go ahead and continue to elect either your democrat or republican puppets and watch America be destroyed. You have absolutely no right to complain about it anymore.
Thanks for the link, Makes perfect sense to me . Just one more zombie here gonna vote for Paul !
I honestly don't know what Cain's position on military spending and unnecessary wars is; however, Romney has advocated increased military spending and has been a strong proponent of the wars in the Middle East.
Wow, one more reason not to vote for Paul. What a nut.
What is nutty about our US Consitution and the limits it places on our federal government, especially in regard to war?
Or, do you think we are winning friends and influence foriegn nations to our side through the military aggression we've practiced since Clinton bombed Yugoslvia via NATO? Each administration since has become more aggressive militarily speaking when there was no immediate threat to US soil?
I honestly don't know what Cain's position on military spending and unnecessary wars is; however, Romney has advocated increased military spending and has been a strong proponent of the wars in the Middle East.
Cain is a black version of Bush. He is a war monger.
This is a problem I have with Obama. If there is good reason he should tell us. At this time it seems we are just hanging around there. Then again jobs and plenty of them are tied to this war so there you go.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
