Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-20-2011, 08:55 PM
 
2,472 posts, read 3,197,496 times
Reputation: 2268

Advertisements

No, I think they need something to be angry at for no reason. "You mean I can't make people inhale my second hand smoke anymore?! BS!"

 
Old 10-20-2011, 08:58 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,217,585 times
Reputation: 6553
Well if a non smoker that chews spits on a smoker is that wrong? Well thats how it feels for a non-smoker to have to put up with a smokers habit.
Your smoke invades our space, taints the smell of our clothes, and puts our health at risk. So is it wrong to not want to deal with a smokers habit?
 
Old 10-20-2011, 09:03 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,390,751 times
Reputation: 3086
I absolutely believe smokers are treated unfairly. Even though being exposed to someone who is under the weather is possibly quite dangerous especially to the elderly and infants we don't have all sorts of rules that prohibit where you can go when you are sick.

Then there is obesity and the associated problems like heart disease and type 2 diabetes, but you don't see warning signs on potato chips, burgers, and ice cream.
 
Old 10-20-2011, 09:10 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,860,561 times
Reputation: 1517
Yep. I could see if people wanted to ban smoking in public areas etc. I could at least understand that. But banning smoking on private property, bars for example, that's complete tyrannical BS.
 
Old 10-20-2011, 09:15 PM
 
Location: Between Seattle and Portland
1,266 posts, read 3,223,021 times
Reputation: 1526
If smokers were considerate enough to voluntarily wear one of these or, if not considerate, mandated to by our benevolent Big Brother Nanny State , then I'd have no problem whatsoever with them indulging in their suicidal filthy habit in public:

Self-contained breathing apparatus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Their right to exhale their carcinogenic spew ends where my nose begins.
 
Old 10-20-2011, 09:24 PM
 
3,265 posts, read 3,193,171 times
Reputation: 1440
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
Yep. I could see if people wanted to ban smoking in public areas etc. I could at least understand that. But banning smoking on private property, bars for example, that's complete tyrannical BS.
On the other hand it's nice being able to go out to bars and concerts and not have my eyes stinging and watering within 30 minutes. I do disagree heavily with banning all flavored tobacco except menthol (at the behest of Phillip-Morris and their phalanx of lobbyists). Now that's some BS. And state level bans on hookah bars. People have the right to gather in a private establishment for the explicit purpose of smoking.
 
Old 10-20-2011, 09:25 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,860,561 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by box_of_zip_disks View Post
On the other hand it's nice being able to go out to bars and concerts and not have my eyes stinging and watering within 30 minutes.
Yeah it sure is "nice" to control other people and what they do on their own property ain't it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by box_of_zip_disks View Post
I do disagree heavily with banning all flavored tobacco except menthol (at the behest of Phillip-Morris and their phalanx of lobbyists). Now that's some BS. And state level bans on hookah bars. People have the right to gather in a private establishment for the explicit purpose of smoking.
Well that's what I'm talking about, private property.
 
Old 10-20-2011, 09:26 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,440,811 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magritte25 View Post
I think smoking is maligned unfairly. It's the current evil of society. I wish people wouldn't be so hypocritical about cigarette smoke & their own health.
What how can you say that. Second hand smoke is responsible for a lot of people getting cancer lung cancer.

Why is it that some smokers, not all, are so irresponsible with their habit. Do they really have to puff puff puff the smoke in my direction. I am alergic to cigarette smoke.
And one day, i saw a young guy smoking that let out his car window a still burning ciagrette. Smart that was not.

Too many innocent people because of second hand smoke, their lifes have been upturned. I feel as a human, we have a right to care about our own health, no one else will.

Maybe if smokers would have been considerate from day one things would be different. I feel the same way about drinking and drving, don't.
 
Old 10-20-2011, 09:30 PM
 
Location: Springfield, Ohio
14,680 posts, read 14,641,413 times
Reputation: 15405
Quote:
Originally Posted by california-jewel View Post
What how can you say that. Second hand smoke is responsible for a lot of people getting cancer lung cancer.

Why is it that some smokers, not all, are so irresponsible with their habit. Do they really have to puff puff puff the smoke in my direction. I am alergic to cigarette smoke.
And one day, i saw a young guy smoking that let out his car window a still burning ciagrette. Smart that was not.

Too many innocent people because of second hand smoke, their lifes have been upturned. I feel as a human, we have a right to care about our own health, no one else will.

Maybe if smokers would have been considerate from day one things would be different. I feel the same way about drinking and drving, don't.
There's also the enormous health care costs involved with smoking most do not understand unless they see it first-hand. Smoking is not a completely selfless act; I'm not saying to make it illegal, but don't give me the crybaby BS about "smokers rights" when you still have 400,000 people dying in the U.S. every year from it and completely ignore the repercussions of that fact.
 
Old 10-20-2011, 09:32 PM
 
Location: Long Island (chief in S Farmingdale)
22,184 posts, read 19,457,116 times
Reputation: 5302
No, smokers put the health of others around them at risk.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top