Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Carefully and tenderly unmasking the bilious hypocrisy of one particular Birther in this forum. You want to joint the fun?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DraggingCanoe
Where does it say in Wong Kim Ark v The United States WKA was affirmed a citizen? It does not.
"Upon the facts agreed in this case, the American citizenship which Wong Kim Ark acquired by birth within the United States has not been lost or taken away by anything happening since his birth."
Are you actually asserting that a total stranger can arrive at a British airport, declare they are a British citizen, and not have to document it?
Really?
Depends... If they want a British passport, no. But the same is true of U.S. citizens. They, too, must provide documentation to acquire a U.S. passport. Not all citizens want or need passports, however.
Lets clear up all the mud being spread around in this forum by the Obots.
In Minor v Happersett the unanimous court defined a natural born citizen as those who are born on US soil to citizen parents. The persons not born to citizen parents were characterized by the court as foreigners that might be citizens. These foreigners citizenship need to be resolved. Those born in the US to citizen parents nothing needs to be resolved.
There was no dissent in the Minor decision.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.