Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She's invoking the 14th Amendment in its application to the issue.
Exactly.
No court has examined Obama's citizenship subject to the 14th Amendment.
There is no statute which trumps the Constitution.
All courts have done to date is cite Wong Kim Ark in an attempt to affirm Obama's eligibility.
However, Wong Kim Ark DOESN'T apply to Obama as his father WASN'T permanently domiciled in the U.S. at the time of his birth. That FACT is a matter of public record.
Yes, we already know. In Informed Consent's world, Temporary equals years.
No, TEMPORARY equals the designation on a legal federal form:
Quote:
And still it doesn't matter. Because in the United States, if you're born here, you're born a citizen. That's the law in the United States.
Based on what?
Cite it.
Be careful. You DO realize statute cannot change or amend the Constitution.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
