Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
We know the intent and meaning of the 14th Amendment. It is stated in the Congressional Record: "The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens. ’That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means."
Obama was subject to the U.K.'s citizenship jurisdiction via his alien father. He owed allegiance to a foreign power at birth. Not only is Obama Constitutionally ineligible for POTUS, he isn't even a legal U.S. citizen at all. He is only merely regarded as one by current political policy.
We know the intent and meaning of the 14th Amendment. It is stated in the Congressional Record: "The provision is, that ‘all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens. ’That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.’ What do we mean by ‘complete jurisdiction thereof?’ Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means."
Obama was subject to the U.K.'s citizenship jurisdiction via his alien father. He owed allegiance to a foreign power at birth. Not only is Obama Constitutionally ineligible for POTUS, he isn't even a legal U.S. citizen at all. He is only merely regarded as one by current political policy.
It doesn't matter whose interpretation it is. The courts do not agree with that interpretation. They've ruled according to a different interpretation over and over and over again. The interpretation that you support has lost to a different interpretation in the courts. You can repeat your interpretation a zillion times, and it won't change the court rulings one iota.
Based on what? Their belief that the federal government doesn't have to follow the Constitution anymore?
If you want different answers, you're going to have to finally start answering different questions.
They based their decisions on the Constitution itself.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
