Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Okay... then here's the question before the court again:
Quote:
The question is presented in this case, whether, since the adoption of the fourteenth amendment, a woman, who is a citizen of the United States and of the State of Missouri, is a voter in that State, notwithstanding the provision of the constitution and laws of the State, which confine the right of suffrage to men alone.
Where there is any question regarding Virginia Minor's citizenship citizenship?
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent
You may believe so, but SCOTUS clearlydid not. In the decision, SCOTUS examined and defined Minor's Constitutional citizenship status in terms of the SCOTUS definition of Constitutional NBC and found it adequate to evaluate whether she had a Consitutional right of suffrage.
Plain as day.
Dicta can often be very plain. It's still merely dicta.
In Minor v. Happersett, SCOTUS examined and defined Minor's Constitutional citizenship status in terms of the SCOTUS definition of Constitutional NBC and found it adequate to evaluate whether she had a Consitutional right of suffrage.
Plain as day.
agree 100%! SCOTUS elaborated on Minor's citizenship so extensively in the decision, that many Supreme court cases afterwards cited Minor on the citizenship argument calling it a decision. People need to stop talking about irrelevant anchor baby crap, Vattel, George Washington letters, all that is GARBAGE from the legal stand point! Minor is still Supreme law today! and it's the ONLY place where NBC is defined constitutionally!
You did when you claimed this :
SCOTUS directly interprets US citizenship law.
Perhaps all this will be moot, when they expose the fraudulent bc.
Arpaio came up with the idea to demand the original microfilm of Obama's birth certificate after he saw evidence from his Cold Case Posse in Maricopa County, Ariz., that apparently released to the public three different versions of the long-form birth certificate.
"Show me the microfilm, not the copies the White House released," Arpaio has insisted.
agree 100%! SCOTUS elaborated on Minor's citizenship so extensively in the decision, that many Supreme court cases afterwards cited Minor on the citizenship argument calling it a decision. People need to stop talking about irrelevant anchor baby crap, Vattel, George Washington letters, all that is GARBAGE from the legal stand point! Minor is still Supreme law today! and it's the ONLY place where NBC is defined constitutionally!
Minor has never once been cited as precedent regarding its definition of citizen. The reason it is most commonly cited is its assertion that the Constitution must be understood in the language of common law. That was one of the two reasons it was cited in Wong.
In Wong it was also cited to prove that the Court did not believe that the children of aliens were not citizens.
Both reasons it was cited are bad for Birthers.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
: