Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-01-2011, 09:01 AM
 
Location: around racist white people
1,610 posts, read 1,783,576 times
Reputation: 700

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
The heck they didn't, TARP was the final straw that gave the Tea Party legs to stand upon. Most fiscal conservatives have been mad as Hades that Newt & Co. broke their "Contract with America" and spent frivoulsy to bring us to the point that a Marxist like Obama and his Progressive/Communist friends spend even more and more.



They play the race card because there is no defense for Obama's policies.
Honestly, most Americans didn't know the tea party existed when bush was in office and we all get our news from the same source, it's these things that gives dems ammo...



Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-01-2011, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,232,710 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by stick2dascript View Post
Nope, tea party was born outta frustration with too much diversity, government assistance that helps the poor too much, a shrinking job market massive free trade and a black urban brother at times in the white house.

Most tea party members are older, why would they be against government like this since alot depend on it?

Alot of it is fear of losing control of what they built to others that don't look like them.

Herman cain is a great example, he's losing ground and he's saying things that are more pro black as of late... watch his ratings slip.

Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk
How much spending is to much for a liberal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 12:26 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,538,281 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
How much spending is to much for a liberal
Tea party please we are discussing the tea party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 12:49 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,331,588 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by enemy country View Post
Serious question for you. If Obama is not elected in 2008 would you have even thought about voting for cain?
Question for you. Why not? The man is smart. He has business success, and a lot of experience that makes him well qualified.

Barrack Obama had nothing going for him. He had no experience in the private sector, had never run a business and had to make a payroll. It is clear that he doesn't even understand business!

Obama was elected on the basis of the color of his skin alone. It was fashionable to vote for the "black guy", and it showed you weren't 'racist'.

If anyone tried to point out who he was, those of us that did some research and read what was available, were called "racist". I knew, for example, that he had been a member of the New Party in Chicago (communists). I also knew of his association with Bill Ayers, how they had met, and the projects that they had worked on together. Obama tried to claim that he barely knew him!

People ignored his 20 year association with Rev. Wright, a black liberation theoligist.

There was much more. Nobody wanted to hear it, and the MSM didn't touch it. They were all about promoting this man to be the next POTUS.

Was I going to vote for this man? No way! He was steeped in communism, socialism, and Marxism from childhood. He believed in it.

Lastly, the issue of his birth. I believe he was born in Kenya, as his grandmother says, not in Hawaii. Otherwise, why has he never produced an authentic birth certificate (the one produced recently is a proven forgery).

Now we have hindsight. We see what he has done. He has made an absolute mess of the US economy, and he has done it on purpose, because he really believed in bringing about a "fundamental change".

Sorry. We doin't want it.

But, I will vote for Herman Cain if he is our nominee, because he is a Constitutionalist, and has credentials as a conservative. We cannot afford another four years of Barrack Obama. He will destroy this country (which is his intent).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 12:54 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,538,281 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Question for you. Why not? The man is smart. He has business success, and a lot of experience that makes him well qualified.

Barrack Obama had nothing going for him. He had no experience in the private sector, had never run a business and had to make a payroll. It is clear that he doesn't even understand business!

Obama was elected on the basis of the color of his skin alone. It was fashionable to vote for the "black guy", and it showed you weren't 'racist'.

If anyone tried to point out who he was, those of us that did some research and read what was available, were called "racist". I knew, for example, that he had been a member of the New Party in Chicago (communists). I also knew of his association with Bill Ayers, how they had met, and the projects that they had worked on together. Obama tried to claim that he barely knew him!

People ignored his 20 year association with Rev. Wright, a black liberation theoligist.

There was much more. Nobody wanted to hear it, and the MSM didn't touch it. They were all about promoting this man to be the next POTUS.

Was I going to vote for this man? No way! He was steeped in communism, socialism, and Marxism from childhood. He believed in it.

Lastly, the issue of his birth. I believe he was born in Kenya, as his grandmother says, not in Hawaii. Otherwise, why has he never produced an authentic birth certificate (the one produced recently is a proven forgery).

Now we have hindsight. We see what he has done. He has made an absolute mess of the US economy, and he has done it on purpose, because he really believed in bringing about a "fundamental change".

Sorry. We doin't want it.

But, I will vote for Herman Cain if he is our nominee, because he is a Constitutionalist, and has credentials as a conservative. We cannot afford another four years of Barrack Obama. He will destroy this country (which is his intent).
This post is the very reason Obama will win again
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 12:59 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,331,588 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
No, the Tea Party was started under Ron Paul back in 2007. Educate yourself.
That was a different organization with an entirely different purpose. The two are unrelated. (I read about that recently ... can't remember where that article is — perhaps something on American Thinker???).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 01:02 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,232,710 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by enemy country View Post
Tea party please we are discussing the tea party.
Tea party think ther eis too much spending, do you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 01:31 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,538,281 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
Tea party think ther eis too much spending, do you
Yes I also thought it when bush was in office. See the difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 01:47 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth Texas
12,481 posts, read 10,232,710 times
Reputation: 2536
Quote:
Originally Posted by enemy country View Post
Yes I also thought it when bush was in office. See the difference.
So you support the tea party on cutting spending
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 01:58 PM
 
Location: South Carolina
8,145 posts, read 6,538,281 times
Reputation: 1754
Quote:
Originally Posted by wjtwet View Post
So you support the tea party on cutting spending
I will not support the tea party. I will support bringing the troops home and cutting down the war machine. Welfare reform on people and corporations. SS reform that makes it work and keeps political hands off it. The tea party is about one thing Obama. They do not care about those other things or they would have popped up during the bush years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top