Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-01-2011, 08:33 AM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,948,683 times
Reputation: 3159

Advertisements

Right now they do. A person who has a qualified disability can receive disability benefits through the social security Adminstration. The question is should they or should they rely on the charity of others?

Lets assume that a 19 yr old was in an auto accident and is paralyzed. Should tax dollars be used to pay for his wheelchair, food etc. through SSI.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-01-2011, 08:39 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,312,855 times
Reputation: 7364
I don't have a problem with SS.I. being used to help support a paralyzed 19 year old. That safety net it there for all of us. Relying on charity would be too inconsistent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 08:42 AM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,101,264 times
Reputation: 4828
Hell no. That's socialism and is pure evil. The disabled person should have insured himself against such things. If not, his family or church can take care of him. And if not that, then well, he should die in the street. Actions have consequences. It's called personal responsibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 08:44 AM
 
28,164 posts, read 25,305,403 times
Reputation: 16665
I support SSI and SSD for disabled adults and children. Before these programs existed, many disabled people did indeed die on the street. Thankfully, we live in a society that (mostly) recognizes the contributions the disabled community can make when given some help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,326,934 times
Reputation: 2889
If there's the money to pay for it, sure. Oops, there's not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Right now they do. A person who has a qualified disability can receive disability benefits through the social security Adminstration. The question is should they or should they rely on the charity of others?

Lets assume that a 19 yr old was in an auto accident and is paralyzed. Should tax dollars be used to pay for his wheelchair, food etc. through SSI.
It takes less then that. A friend of mine had a four year old son that was diagnosed with ADHD and a slow learner, he was getting full SS and Medicare benefits for his son. How many kids have been diagnosed as ADHD and how many get these benefits?

I did a quick search for adhd social security benefits and here we go:



Social Security Requirements

  • The Listing of Impairments manual used by the Social Security Administration when deciding on the authorization of benefits mandates the satisfaction of two lists of criteria for ADHD. List A requires medical documentation proving marked inattention, impulsiveness and hyperactivity. List B, specifically for children ages 3 to 17, requires medical documentation proving two of three marked impairment conditions: age-appropriate cognitive and communication functioning, social functioning, and personal functioning.

Read more: Social Security Benefits for Children With ADHD | eHow.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 08:47 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,312,855 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Hell no. That's socialism and is pure evil. The disabled person should have insured himself against such things. If not, his family or church can take care of him. And if not that, then well, he should die in the street. Actions have consequences. It's called personal responsibility.
Ya, I'm sure every 19 year old goes out and buys an insurance policy that covers catastrophic events with their very first pay check. Did you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Camberville
15,863 posts, read 21,441,250 times
Reputation: 28209
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Hell no. That's socialism and is pure evil. The disabled person should have insured himself against such things. If not, his family or church can take care of him. And if not that, then well, he should die in the street. Actions have consequences. It's called personal responsibility.

I know you're being sarcastic, but the sad truth is, many people have told me that very thing because I was a 23 year old diagnosed with cancer without family able to help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 08:56 AM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,443,162 times
Reputation: 24980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
I don't have a problem with SS.I. being used to help support a paralyzed 19 year old. That safety net it there for all of us. Relying on charity would be too inconsistent.
Because nothing says consistency like an insolvent government program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-01-2011, 09:02 AM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,948,683 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
It takes less then that. A friend of mine had a four year old son that was diagnosed with ADHD and a slow learner, he was getting full SS and Medicare benefits for his son. How many kids have been diagnosed as ADHD and how many get these benefits?

I did a quick search for adhd social security benefits and here we go:



Social Security Requirements

  • The Listing of Impairments manual used by the Social Security Administration when deciding on the authorization of benefits mandates the satisfaction of two lists of criteria for ADHD. List A requires medical documentation proving marked inattention, impulsiveness and hyperactivity. List B, specifically for children ages 3 to 17, requires medical documentation proving two of three marked impairment conditions: age-appropriate cognitive and communication functioning, social functioning, and personal functioning.
Read more: Social Security Benefits for Children With ADHD | eHow.com

I made the thread so easy that even a person with ADHD could follow. The hypothetical that I posted in the OP is a disability that most would agree is a real disability. Are their questionable disabilities, fraud...certainly, but that is not the point of the thread. The point is whether people with REAL disabilities should receive these benefits? Now, can you answer that question?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top