OWS: Causing cancer? (fast food, legal, drugs, regular)

[Had2SaySumthin]

When you look at the second hand smoke, the cellular phone and internet usage, the fast food consumption, ehhhh.

Are these kids killing themselves in the name of the economy?

[softblueyz]

Originally Posted by Had2SaySumthin

When you look at the second hand smoke, the cellular phone and internet usage, the fast food consumption, ehhhh.

Are these kids killing themselves in the name of the economy?

One can only hope so. But I think it could be the drugs that could do them in.

[Had2SaySumthin]

Originally Posted by softblueyz

One can only hope so. But I think it could be the drugs that could do them in.

Let us not forget the athletes foot and other skin related issues that come from not showering regularly.

Oh the humanity!

[Wynternight]

A study needs to be done to measure the effects of so much patchouli stink in one area. That can't be good for the environment.

[Fred314X]

They're certainly causing cancer in the local restaurant whose business has dropped by more than 30%.

[thebigr]

I think there should be a study why Americans are just so damn stupid. Or should I say bored.

[Had2SaySumthin]

Originally Posted by thebigr

I think there should be a study why Americans are just so damn stupid. Or should I say bored.

We'll have to form a committee so that we can write, and get legislation enacted that will allow us to move forward with the planning stage of determining the parameters of said study.

Once we have determined the parameters, we can write another piece of legislation to provide the funding for the fact finding.

After all the facts are determined, we can then form a sub-committee to determine the social impact of said study, as well as any legal liability that may come from officially branding the stupid.

17 years later, we'll have it done, and then the party that didn't do it can warp the facts and criticize the other in a political debate during a campaign.

[Wynternight]

Originally Posted by Had2SaySumthin

We'll have to form a committee so that we can write, and get legislation enacted that will allow us to move forward with the planning stage of determining the parameters of said study.

Once we have determined the parameters, we can write another piece of legislation to provide the funding for the fact finding.

After all the facts are determined, we can then form a sub-committee to determine the social impact of said study, as well as any legal liability that may come from officially branding the stupid.

17 years later, we'll have it done, and then the party that didn't do it can warp the facts and criticize the other in a political debate during a campaign.

Can I filibuster part 1 of the process and hold it up even longer?

[Had2SaySumthin]

Originally Posted by Wynternight

Can I filibuster part 1 of the process and hold it up even longer?

As long as you don't but a rider on the bill to fund abortion, all is well.

The United States Government, the joke that never ended.

.......and we're the punchline.

[Rick Roma]

Originally Posted by Had2SaySumthin

Let us not forget the athletes foot and other skin related issues that come from not showering regularly.

Oh the humanity!

You appear to be well versed in the subject.