Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-15-2011, 11:34 AM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,185,973 times
Reputation: 6963

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01Snake View Post
Overreact much?
Why not? It's time that the hard fist of the law came down hard on all those marxists, pissers, defecators, anti-american, scum, idiots, spoiled brats, vermin, commies, anarchists, cry-babies...
how many more names can you think of for the OWS?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-15-2011, 11:36 AM
 
7,006 posts, read 6,994,198 times
Reputation: 7060
Judge Who Issued Occupy Wall Street Restraining Order Was Longtime ACLU Lawyer
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Blankity-blank!
11,446 posts, read 16,185,973 times
Reputation: 6963
the solution is obvious; only white christian conservatives should be judges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 11:40 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,176,487 times
Reputation: 9270
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
By that rationale, the city could just make a law that prevents signs, petitions, megaphones (they already do) and standing in a park or on a sidewalk for more than 30 seconds. Then they could just arrest anyone for "breaking the law", no questions asked, right?
That slippery slope doesn't exist in this case. No one so far on this thread has truly suggesting limiting free speech.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 11:45 AM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,101,264 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visvaldis View Post
the solution is obvious; only white christian conservatives should be judges.
Like Bob Barr and Dick Armey (both white, christian, conservative ACLU members).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
Like Bob Barr and Dick Armey (both white, christian, conservative ACLU members).
Which of those men was ever a lawyer at ACLU? Members aren't all lawyers
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 12:05 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,268,118 times
Reputation: 4269
These people who don't dislike this kind of ruling, that was made before the judge knew that the rules had been changed by the owners must all support the rights of the protesters to overcome ownership through 'squatters rights". I would say that the judge and her supporters here don't really consider ownership being something can't change from using "squatters' rights".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 12:07 PM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,975,567 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Visvaldis View Post
Why not? It's time that the hard fist of the law came down hard on all those marxists, pissers, defecators, anti-american, scum, idiots, spoiled brats, vermin, commies, anarchists, cry-babies...
how many more names can you think of for the OWS?
I just call them Nazi sympathizers and call it a day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 12:08 PM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,948,683 times
Reputation: 3159
My understanding is this is an injunction until a hearing can be held. I don't believe this is a final order so all the crying is premature.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2011, 12:13 PM
 
Location: Maryland
7,814 posts, read 6,392,163 times
Reputation: 9974

The judge is friendly to the NLG which is why she was woken up in the middle of the night and from what I understand she has already been tossed off the case. There are 2 Supreme Court precedents at play here when it comes to camping/providing a place for free speech so any judge who sides with the occupiers will probably be overturned shortly.

Cox v. New Hampshire - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clark v. Community for Creative Nonviolence
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top