Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-07-2011, 12:21 PM
 
4,428 posts, read 4,481,378 times
Reputation: 1356

Advertisements

The House already has proposed a bill - that the Senate won't take up ( surprise ) - to speed up the process of giving the green light to the Keystone pipeline project. A pipeline from Canada to Texas, which would create at least 50,000 jobs.

Obama is being urged by Democratic leaders to postpone any decision until after the 2012 election. Obama will likely remain partisan and do what they tell him to do.


Jobs are priority #1


Yeah, Right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-07-2011, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,259,818 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat View Post
The House already has proposed a bill - that the Senate won't take up ( surprise ) - to speed up the process of giving the green light to the Keystone pipeline project. A pipeline from Canada to Texas, which would create at least 50,000 jobs.

Obama is being urged by Democratic leaders to postpone any decision until after the 2012 election. Obama will likely remain partisan and do what they tell him to do.


Jobs are priority #1


Yeah, Right.
GREEN jobs are number one to Obama. This pipeline is for something other than green. He doesn't know that we have all kinds of shorter pipelines running all over this country and they don't all carry refined products, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 12:32 PM
 
Location: South Dakota
2,608 posts, read 2,096,800 times
Reputation: 769
Delightful, should help keep energy prices skyrocketing Comrades!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 12:35 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,118,390 times
Reputation: 9409
Environmentalists are trying in vein to reign in Obama's attention on the matter. I'd surmise that they've had his attention all along....but unfortunately for the EnviroNazi's it's an election year and they simply do not wield the clout to accomplish anything substantial. At the most basic level, Obama will drag is his feet and take no action at all in order to appease them. At the higher level, Obama will approve it and everyone but the EN's will celebrate.

It will be interesting to see what happens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 12:39 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,924,458 times
Reputation: 12828
Behold Obama's laser focus on destroying jobs by pandering to his far left base.

Keystone
Boeing

But really, this country doesn't need the 150K+ jobs created by those two projects alone right? What is that, 3 months worth of "jobs created" by the UE statistics? An entire quarter of a year's employment?

I mean really, it is not as though Obama is going to try to make the GOP look evil by the US being to broke to hand out more extended UE benefits to the 99+ weekers, right? He'll gin up more voted by demonizing unemployment levels then actually allowing the private sector to create real jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,771,962 times
Reputation: 24863
OPEC must love the idea of our importing oil they do not control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Between Seattle and Portland
1,266 posts, read 3,223,021 times
Reputation: 1526
Enviro-Nazi here with a let's see...

Jobs or ---

Further development of a foreign country's toxic tar sands which have been linked to cancer spikes, forest destruction, loss of wildlife, and climate-disrupting pollution. A pipeline that would cut across America's most important agricultural aquifer and, when the inevitable spill occurs, cause devastation to farmers and groundwater drinking supplies.

Just say NO to the Keystone Pipeline.

(Save the flaming -- I'm a Liberal, remember?)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 12:52 PM
 
4,428 posts, read 4,481,378 times
Reputation: 1356
The Westerner: Keystone Pipeline Delay Puts Energy Future On Hold


Here's the deal .....

If Obama nixes this ( and screws Americans who are unemployed from 50,000 jobs ) the Canadian company will point this pipeline toward the Pacific Ocean. All this oil has to be sold.

They Will Sell It To CHINA.


Shouldn't the U.S. buy more oil from one of it's friends and reduce it's dependency on the Middle East?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 12:55 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,924,458 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yooperkat View Post
The Westerner: Keystone Pipeline Delay Puts Energy Future On Hold


Here's the deal .....

If Obama nixes this ( and screws Americans who are unemployed from 50,000 jobs ) the Canadian company will point this pipeline toward the Pacific Ocean. All this oil has to be sold.

They Will Sell It To CHINA.


Shouldn't the U.S. buy more oil from one of it's friends and reduce it's dependency on the Middle East?
Absolutely. Most of us actually get this. But, not the far left. It is their intention to absolutely destroy the USA. We need energy independence as a matter of national security and that requires every source we can utilize.

tar sands | White House | pipeline | The Daily Caller
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 01:06 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,118,390 times
Reputation: 9409
Quote:
Originally Posted by stonecypher5413 View Post
Enviro-Nazi here with a let's see...

Jobs or ---

Further development of a foreign country's toxic tar sands which have been linked to cancer spikes, forest destruction, loss of wildlife, and climate-disrupting pollution. A pipeline that would cut across America's most important agricultural aquifer and, when the inevitable spill occurs, cause devastation to farmers and groundwater drinking supplies.

Just say NO to the Keystone Pipeline.

(Save the flaming -- I'm a Liberal, remember?)
Spills are not necessarily "inevitable," and the spills that are pipeline related generally are contained in self-containment systems.

I like water, wildlife, and forests too, but all the emotional strings that always come with the environmental argument really have no bearing on the truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:08 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top