Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: For or Against Term Limits
For Term Limits 55 78.57%
Against Term Limits 14 20.00%
I have another Idea (Post it) 1 1.43%
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-16-2011, 01:29 PM
 
Location: Back and Forth FRANCE
2,713 posts, read 3,023,523 times
Reputation: 1483

Advertisements

Just wondering how people feel about Term Limits, specifically Presidential
If a President is doing a great job doing his presidency. (As defined by his supporters of course).
Do you think a President should be allowed to Serve more then 2 Terms?

I'm not saying get rid of the elections every 4 years.

I just believe that if a President has good policies he/she should not be "forced out" after 8 years.
He should allowed to run to stay in office (defend his seat), or eligible to run again in the future.

Do you support the Maximum 2 Terms for presidents.
The Twenty Second Amendment...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-16-2011, 01:33 PM
 
912 posts, read 1,331,869 times
Reputation: 468
2 terms is enough for any president .Depending on the official ,one is sometimes more than enough.That is for another arguement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,213,816 times
Reputation: 4258
Two terms works well. No need for a control SOB to gather too much influence, regardless of achievements. If he's that good, he can lead without the constraints of politics.

I support term limits for Congress as well. It's not enough that 'That's what elections are for' crap. Too many Reps or Senators have played the cards to their own benefit, with few rewards for citizens. Elections are just a way to get into office, and fail as a way to police the Congressman.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,386,012 times
Reputation: 8672
I have another idea....

How about we use the term limits that are already in place?

House of Representatives - 2 years before they have to reup.

President - 4 years before they have to reup.

Senate - 6 years before they have to reup.

We already have term limits, if people of the state in question want to reassign them to duty, thats their business. Elections are term limits.

Those who espouse term limits as a fix to government ills are usually upset that a neighboring state or district has elected someone that they don't like mutiple times. No one in Tennessee, Florida, or New York has any right to tell California who to vote for, and vice versa.

Its a sore loser cry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Fort Worth, TX
9,394 posts, read 15,691,376 times
Reputation: 6262
I'm for it. Without it, you get people like Marion "Mayor For Life" Barry, look what he did to DC...

e: If a president is that great then his party ought to put up a similar person who will continue his policies for the election.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 01:54 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,193,725 times
Reputation: 18824
I like the idea in a sense, but we shouldn't use term limits as a reason to make politicians act more courageous. But as it is, these clowns won't do anything principled so long as they plan to run for another election.

The main problem is that the American people are a bunch of idiots. This bullsh*t about "throw the bums out" is laughable. More often than not, they end up putting incumbents back in office and vote for people that give incumbents every advantage.

Mitch McConnell once said quite publicly that "the American people don't care where we get our money from." LMAO....aint like he whispered it...he said it blatantly. And the dumbasses in Kentucky reelected him anyway. So whose fault is that?

Term limits is nothing more than people imposing terms on politicians because the voters can't help themselves when it comes to voting in the same idiots over and over again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,386,012 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
I like the idea in a sense, but we shouldn't use term limits as a reason to make politicians act more courageous. But as it is, these clowns won't do anything principled so long as they plan to run for another election.

The main problem is that the American people are a bunch of idiots. This bullsh*t about "throw the bums out" is laughable. More often than not, they end up putting incumbents back in office and vote for people that give incumbents every advantage.

Mitch McConnell once said quite publicly that "the American people don't care where we get our money from." LMAO....aint like he whispered it...he said it blatantly. And the dumbasses in Kentucky reelected him anyway. So whose fault is that?

Term limits is nothing more than people imposing terms on politicians because the voters can't help themselves when it comes to voting in the same idiots over and over again.

So you want to save most of the country from itself?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 01:55 PM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,860,984 times
Reputation: 1517
Term limits are a band-aid on the problem of tyranny of the majority.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 01:55 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,193,725 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurricaneDC View Post
I'm for it. Without it, you get people like Marion "Mayor For Life" Barry, look what he did to DC...

e: If a president is that great then his party ought to put up a similar person who will continue his policies for the election.
If the people of D.C. want to be governed by Barry, then it's their business. You're free to not live there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-16-2011, 01:57 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,193,725 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979 View Post
So you want to save most of the country from itself? How communist of you.
Huh?

Again, i like the sound of term limits, but i'd prefer that people would simply be smart enough to vote out tired incumbents on their own without changing the law.

Unfortunately, that's not the case. But oh well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top