Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:16 AM
 
Location: Minnysoda
10,659 posts, read 10,721,455 times
Reputation: 6745

Advertisements

It says the Gov is responsible for the National Defense. Corperations with the best tech to do that get the sales. ergo Goverment invests in research.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:25 AM
 
Location: MS
4,395 posts, read 4,909,291 times
Reputation: 1564
Quote:
Originally Posted by my54ford View Post
It says the Gov is responsible for the National Defense. Corperations with the best tech to do that get the sales. ergo Goverment invests in research.....
I'm talking about the research into energy and loans to companies like Solyndra.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:27 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,023,289 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
For example, imagine if the USA managed to create some super source of power, and then we could keep it inside the US, offering it to companies that were inside our borders. It wouldnt take long to dominate the world on an economic basis once again, and the military implications would be huge.
We already have this, it's called coal. There is only two nations on this planet with vast reserves of diverse fossil fuel energy compared to their needs/population. The US and Russia, most certainly other nations would like to see the use of this resource restricted.

If you take China for example they will exhaust their supply within the next 20 to 30 years at their current rate of consumption.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:33 AM
 
45,201 posts, read 26,417,923 times
Reputation: 24964
A couple of two-three things...besides being unconstitutional, how many things does the government do more efficiently than the private sector?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:36 AM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,943,270 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringwise View Post
It's not our government's job to spend money on finding alternative energy. It IS their job to protect the country.
Military invasion is not the only riske to our country. The fact that you buy most of a necessity from other countries is a risk to our country. We need to be self sufficient on necessities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:41 AM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,440,298 times
Reputation: 3050
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
If all the money spent on wars/actions taken in the interests of getting/protecting our oil supply had been spent on alternative energy advancement, how far do you think we'd be in using alternative sources?
Up to 2007 our Armed duty personnel is the smallest since 1950 at 1,459,462
2007 1,380,082

1955 it fluctuated from 2,935,107 to 1990 2,043,705 and has dropped since then




Active Duty Military Personnel, 1940



.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:44 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,917,108 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by old_cold View Post
If all the money spent on wars/actions taken in the interests of getting/protecting our oil supply had been spent on alternative energy advancement, how far do you think we'd be in using alternative sources?
Not very far. A country with no military but rich natural resources is called: target for invasion.

Read the Constitution sometime. The federal government actually has a duty to provide for the defense of this country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,170 posts, read 26,179,590 times
Reputation: 27914
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
Not very far. A country with no military but rich natural resources is called: target for invasion.

Read the Constitution sometime. The federal government actually has a duty to provide for the defense of this country.
There iis a difference on maintaining a military force and engaging in warfare.
The OP asks about one, not the other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 09:06 AM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,943,270 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
Up to 2007 our Armed duty personnel is the smallest since 1950 at 1,459,462
2007 1,380,082

1955 it fluctuated from 2,935,107 to 1990 2,043,705 and has dropped since then




Active Duty Military Personnel, 1940



.
So? If we are not involved in a WW we do not need to keep a huge active duty military. Besides most of the increase in military spending has problem been from paying the military industrial complex.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 09:34 AM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,967,439 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
True, but the OP's question does bring up an interesting thought.

For example, imagine if the USA managed to create some super source of power, and then we could keep it inside the US, offering it to companies that were inside our borders. It wouldnt take long to dominate the world on an economic basis once again, and the military implications would be huge.
How 'bout we let the free market take care of that? Because we ALL know that once the US had this technology, the companies that had access to the technology would be the ones that were campaign donors to the administration.

With the most corrupt administration in MY lifetime occupying the WH, if that was the case now, any GOP donor would be shut out of that technology, as would any states that voted GOP, and any states that were right-to-work states, etc.

No thank you....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top