Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:46 AM
 
Location: MS
4,395 posts, read 4,911,959 times
Reputation: 1564

Advertisements

1. No spending cuts - We are already in a hole so deep it will take a century or more to get out of. At this rate of spending we are Greece in just a few years.
2. Not big enough - That's the left's answer to why their projects fail. We didn't spend enough. They keep spending more and more on education and the scores keep dropping. The last stimulus was supposed to keep unemployment under 8% and it didn't...Infrastructure - The last stimulus put up 2 stoplights in my town as well as fixing the curbs on some streets. Where in the world does the federal government get the power to spend on these things?
3. Tax the super rich - You can confiscate the wealth of the super rich and it still won't cover the deficit for one year.
4. Yes, military cuts willl save money. But what is this corporate welfare that he speaks of? I'd like a clear and concise definition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:46 AM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,930,375 times
Reputation: 12828
A big labor Communist calling for a larger central government to provide work. I'm shocked, shocked I tell you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:47 AM
 
3,457 posts, read 3,622,976 times
Reputation: 1544
im not crazy about robert reich, but what he proposed seemed pretty reasonable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:47 AM
 
3,498 posts, read 2,217,906 times
Reputation: 646
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
FDR? is it you?
I think many, if not most would consider that comparision a compliment more than an insult.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:49 AM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24980
Quote:
Originally Posted by lifelongMOgal View Post
A big labor Communist calling for a larger central government to provide work. I'm shocked, shocked I tell you.
Can't blame him,look how well central planning has worked in the past
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:53 AM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,947,486 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Puppy View Post
I think many, if not most would consider that comparision a compliment more than an insult.
Absolutely. When someone criticizes FDR as a terrible president, they lose instant credibility. The Reich has a great nuts and bolts plan. He is not saying raise the deficit. He is saying lets have an increase in spending to create jobs and lets charge it to the people who have benefitted the most from living in this country. Sounds like a good economic plan to get the U.S. back on track.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:58 AM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,180,466 times
Reputation: 23891
Reich's points are in red.

1. No cuts until unemployment is down to 5%.


Right now unemployment is high - which means less tax money is coming into the treasury. Yet we should continue spending money at the same levels? Actually, we are increasing the rate of spending right now. We can't cut foreign aid? We can't cut green energy subsidies that's based on unproven technology? Plus - it's hard to keep score without a budget.

2. Make the boost big enough.

Again - we are bring in less money, yet we are supposed to boost spending with jobs programs. The government should not be responsible for putting people to work. They can aid in productivity. Productivity should be the goal - not employment. Employment will take care of itself if productivity is the focus.

3. Pay for this by raising taxes on the super rich.

There is no budget framework to work from. Why should we believe the tax money will be spent properly. Also, don't agree with taxing the rich a certain segment of the population

4. Cut where the real bloat where it is - military and corporate welfare.

We should not cut from the ONE thing that we know is the government's responsibility, which is defending Americans. If it's wasteful, then OK. Cut corporate welfare - OK - does that include Solyndra and other green energy ventures that received over $20B Dept. of Energy dollars? What hypocrites. The repeatedly call for ending corporate welfare while doing that exact thing for their friends.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:59 AM
 
8,630 posts, read 9,135,767 times
Reputation: 5990
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
At one time, the best and brightest thought the world was flat.
Not true. A matter of fact it was the other way around. Most smart folks with common sense looked at our sun and moon and put 2 and 2 together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 08:59 AM
 
3,566 posts, read 3,733,266 times
Reputation: 1364
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair2 View Post
Absolutely. When someone criticizes FDR as a terrible president, they lose instant credibility. The Reich has a great nuts and bolts plan. He is not saying raise the deficit. He is saying lets have an increase in spending to create jobs and lets charge it to the people who have benefitted the most from living in this country. Sounds like a good economic plan to get the U.S. back on track.
Where is the evidence that such "a good economic plan" has ever worked in the past? If a trillion-dollar stimulus didn't do the trick how much is it going to take?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-18-2011, 09:00 AM
 
12,436 posts, read 11,947,486 times
Reputation: 3159
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimMe View Post
Where is the evidence that such "a good economic plan" has ever worked in the past? If a trillion-dollar stimulus didn't do the trick how much is it going to take?
He points to types of programs that were used during the great depression. They worked then. They should work now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top