Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I looked it up again becasue I posted it last time this topic pops up. This isn't "just about the name", it's about the parents mental stability. The name is just a red flag for someone to notice and thankfully someone did.
Quote:
I hope they reunited soon.
For the kids sake I hope "soon" means "after mom and dad get the help they need". If that's not what you mean then something is wrong.
You have to be sick in the head to name your child adolf hitler. That kid will have a very rough life just like a boy named sue. Adolf will never date or marry a decent woman cause i dont think they want to tell their family & friends they are dating or marrying adolf hitler.
However, last year an appeals court ruled that the older children were at risk due to the parents' "unspecified physical and psychological disabilities," including violence in the home. There was also apparently evidence of abuse or neglect, found by a family court, which the Campbells say is untrue -- they say their children were taken because of their Nazi-inspired names. The Department of Youth and Family Services has denied that:
A DYFS spokesperson told ABCNews.com in 2009 that she could not comment on a specific case, but said children are only taken into custody if there is a suspicion of abuse or neglect. "We would never remove a child simply based on their name," the spokeswoman said.
I am all for freedom of speech but oddly I don't feel one bit sorry for these parents.
I'm with you on this. A parent is suppose to want good for their child , not to use them for their own warped beliefs. It is pretty clear what their agenda is by the names chosen. What good can come to a child with these names?
Why are these parents so selfish in their personal hatred that they don't seek the best for their children? Keep them in foster care, It would be my preference that they were sterilized as I see no need to reproduce their genes.
Naming your baby after one of the most evil men to ever live isn't a really good idea.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
