Climategate 2.0: More Emails Released on Aniversity of Climategate 1
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Please do not equate AGW lemmings with environmentalists. They are not the same.
I'm an environmentalist but do not believe the AGW hoax.
The political gangsters have hijacked the environmentalist platform to push AWG ... looks like environmentalist will get collateral damage. The environmentalist should be out front saying they don't support AWG
They've been exposed again, but I also expect the MSM to ignore this.
A few news outlets have reported the release, but they are not delving into the content as yet....same thing they did with Climategate 1, which exposed them for their outrageous bias.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don9
The political gangsters have hijacked the environmentalist platform to push AWG ... looks like environmentalist will get collateral damage. The environmentalist should be out front saying they don't support AWG
Some have been been doing just that, trying to distance themselves from the fear mongers of the corrupt cabal.
The political gangsters have hijacked the environmentalist platform to push AWG ... looks like environmentalist will get collateral damage. The environmentalist should be out front saying they don't support AWG
Exactly. I care about having clean water, reducing our plastic waste, I recycle, I don't agree with drilling for oil especially when we don't get to keep all the oil we drill (and besides, our reserves are too little to make a lasting impact on gas prices), etc. The one thing that separates me from real environmentalists and fake environmentalists, is that I believe CO2 is not a pollutant that must be taxed and regulated
At one point, Jones admits that the “basic problem is that all of the models are wrong.” When the models do not show what the warmists want them to show, they simply apply “some tuning.” One scientist was worried enough about this “tuning” to write that he “doubt[ed] the modeling world will be able to get away with this much longer.”
Amazing. Been suspected for a long, long time (what credible scientist would refuse to release their raw data, if not for something they are HIDING?), CONFIRMED by this latest batch of corruption from this core group of shysters.
Remember, these frauds get PAID to say that there is global warming from CO2, if it ever came out that the mythical fairy tale of global warming is complete BS, they wouldn't have a job anymore...
Remember, these frauds get PAID to say that there is global warming from CO2, if it ever came out that the mythical fairy tale of global warming ever came out, they wouldn't have a job anymore...
Got to keep the gravy train going, which depends on bilking taxpayers out of hundreds of billions in new taxes.
Are your tax dollars helping hide global warming data from the public? Internal emails leaked as part of “Climategate 2.0” indicate the answer may be "Yes."
Quote:
The original Climategate emails -- correspondence stolen from servers at a research facility in the U.K. and released on the Internet in late 2009 -- shook up the field of climate research. Now a new batch posted in late November to a Russian server shows that scientists at the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit refused to share their U.S. government-funded data with anyone they thought would disagree with them.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.